H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mashona Washington vs Janet Lee H2H: 1-1
Mashona Washington and Janet Lee are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mashona Washington leads 1–0 on carpet, while Janet Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janet Lee won the 2000 US Open first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 49
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2000 | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Janet Lee | 6-4 6-4 | Mashona Washington | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2000* | Oklahoma | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Mashona Washington | 4-6 6-3 7-6(2) | Janet Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mashona Washington | #990 | #50 | 676 | 1,647 | 42 | 76 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Janet Lee | #863 | #79 | 390 | 1,560 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mashona Washington | Janet Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #547 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #270 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #169 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #86 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #130 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #217 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #199 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #694 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #73 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #230 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #364 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |