H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mashona Washington vs Janet Lee H2H: 1-1

Mashona Washington and Janet Lee are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mashona Washington leads 1–0 on carpet, while Janet Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janet Lee won the 2000 US Open first round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mashona Washington
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Janet Lee
TPE Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Janet Lee #124 6-4 6-4 Mashona Washington #114 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Mashona Washington #129 4-6 6-3 7-6(2) Janet Lee #110 Match data Feb 24, 2000* R32 Oklahoma Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mashona Washington #990 #50 676 1,645 42 76 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Janet Lee #863 #79 390 1,570 31 67 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mashona Washington Janet Lee
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #547 1,491 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–2 33.3% #270 1,508 0 0
18 1994 0–1 0.0% #407 1,499 0 0 1995 4–7 36.4% #169 1,519 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 0–2 0.0% #175 1,513 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 3–4 42.9% #114 1,525 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1998 4–14 22.2% #86 1,498 0 0
22 1998 1–3 25.0% #165 1,493 0 0 1999 5–10 33.3% #95 1,487 0 0
23 1999 4–5 44.4% #130 1,506 0 0 2000 5–8 38.5% #117 1,514 0 0
24 2000 3–9 25.0% #142 1,481 0 0 2001 7–9 43.8% #111 1,555 0 0
25 2001 1–2 33.3% #134 1,489 0 0 2002 1–6 14.3% #217 1,524 0 0
26 2002 1–5 16.7% #109 1,470 0 0 2003 1–3 25.0% #162 1,511 0 0
27 2003 1–5 16.7% #199 1,441 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2004 13–12 52.0% #53 1,581 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #694 1,495 0 0
29 2005 13–22 37.1% #73 1,586 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2006 5–10 33.3% #230 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2008 0–1 0.0% #309 1,562 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2010 0–1 0.0% #364 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mashona Washington Janet Lee
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1998 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 1999 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2001 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2003 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 11 10 21 52.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 5 14 19 26.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 28 52 80 35.0% 4 12 16 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — 26 46 72 36.1% 1 11 12 8.3% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mashona Washington Janet Lee
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1492 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.01
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1508 115.6 — — — — +41 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–0 — — -0.45
18 1994 1500 110.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.19 1995 1519 101.0 — — — — +57 +14 — 28.6% -2.14 1–0 3–0 (100%) — -0.04
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1514 120.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.48
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1526 105.6 — — — — +53 — — 37.5% -1.13 2–0 0–1 — +0.41
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1499 121.5 — — — — +38 — — 30.0% -1.10 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 92.7 -0.18
22 1998 1494 104.5 — — — — +27 — — 33.3% -1.11 0–1 1–1 — +0.08 1999 1488 111.5 — — — — +57 -62 — 38.2% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.61
23 1999 1506 104.0 — — — — +24 — — 47.4% -0.53 0–1 1–1 — +0.76 2000 1515 113.7 — — — — +33 — — 43.3% -0.40 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.34
24 2000 1481 104.4 — — — — +34 — — 26.9% -2.00 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.23 2001 1556 116.3 — — — — +6 — — 47.2% +0.08 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — +0.01
25 2001 1489 110.4 — — — — +28 — — 42.9% -0.86 0–1 — — -0.08 2002 1525 103.5 — — — — +30 — — 13.3% -2.93 1–0 1–1 — -0.90
26 2002 1470 104.3 — — — — +40 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–1 1–1 — -0.30 2003 1512 102.1 -0.98 -0.78 0.826 45.5% — — +13 33.3% -0.45 0–1 0–1 — +0.01
27 2003 1441 96.8 — — — — +23 — — 26.7% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1581 124.4 -0.46 +0.14 0.897 47.0% -15 — — 51.8% +0.25 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — +0.41 2005 1496 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
29 2005 1586 116.5 +0.23 -0.86 0.949 48.9% -73 -83 +76 37.8% -0.89 7–5 (58%) 6–4 (60%) 107.0 -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1579 111.3 +0.23 -2.15 0.876 47.1% -56 -69 +67 38.9% -1.14 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1563 98.4 -1.32 -4.37 0.692 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 1539 98.5 -1.16 -3.20 0.911 48.5% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1646 117.0 +0.07 -1.67 0.899 47.7% -13 -78 +74 38.5% -0.92 14–20 (41%) 15–9 (63%) 104.1 -0.29 — 1571 119.1 -0.98 -0.78 0.826 45.5% +36 -24 +13 34.3% -1.01 10–16 (38%) 7–12 (37%) 93.8 -0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.