H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Mashona Washington vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 0-2

Lilia Osterloh holds a 2–0 lead over Mashona Washington in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lilia Osterloh leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lilia Osterloh won the 2000 Miami Open round of 128 6-3 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mashona Washington
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lilia Osterloh #91 6-3 4-6 6-1 Mashona Washington #126 Match data Mar 21, 2000* R128 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lilia Osterloh #75 6-3 6-2 Mashona Washington #154 Match data Mar 19, 1999* R128 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mashona Washington #990 #50 676 1,645 42 76 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,696 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mashona Washington Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1994 0–1 0.0% #407 1,499 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,550 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 1998 1–3 25.0% #165 1,493 0 0 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,596 0 0
23 1999 4–5 44.4% #130 1,506 0 0 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,658 0 0
24 2000 3–9 25.0% #142 1,481 0 0 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 2001 1–2 33.3% #134 1,489 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,508 0 0
26 2002 1–5 16.7% #109 1,470 0 0 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 2003 1–5 16.7% #199 1,441 0 0 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2004 13–12 52.0% #53 1,581 0 0 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2005 13–22 37.1% #73 1,586 0 0 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,544 0 0
30 2006 5–10 33.3% #230 1,578 0 0 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 2008 0–1 0.0% #309 1,562 0 0 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0
34 2010 0–1 0.0% #364 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mashona Washington Lilia Osterloh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 1998 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 1999 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 2000 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2004 11 10 21 52.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2005 5 14 19 26.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2006 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 28 52 80 35.0% 4 12 16 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — 56 76 132 42.4% 11 34 45 24.4% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 22/77 of Mashona Washington's and 52/70 of Lilia Osterloh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mashona Washington Lilia Osterloh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 3/11 0.3 4.3 60.5% 46.3% 46.2% 38.9% 66.7% 46.9% 37.3%
28 2004 1/25 4.0 4.0 55.1% 68.4% 29.0% 40.0% 30.8% 50.7% 44.2% 2006 7/14 0.9 3.6 66.1% 56.0% 39.1% 42.7% 47.9% 49.6% 46.1%
29 2005 9/35 3.2 4.0 67.6% 61.3% 43.0% 56.0% 38.2% 55.4% 42.4% 2007 17/19 1.8 3.6 60.1% 54.8% 45.0% 46.6% 44.5% 50.6% 43.6%
30 2006 10/15 2.5 4.5 64.9% 60.7% 46.9% 46.0% 36.0% 55.6% 38.9% 2008 12/13 1.3 4.6 58.3% 60.2% 37.4% 55.9% 42.2% 50.7% 42.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 6/6 2.2 2.7 62.8% 60.1% 48.3% 55.1% 59.7% 56.1% 39.6%
32 2008 1/1 1.0 5.0 64.5% 55.0% 36.4% 50.0% 40.0% 48.4% 35.7% 2010 7/7 2.9 3.0 61.3% 57.0% 39.1% 47.3% 54.5% 50.0% 37.0%
34 2010 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 57.7% 53.1% 54.5% 60.0% 56.3% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 22/118 2.8 4.1 65.7% 60.9% 44.3% 50.4% 37.9% 55.0% 40.4% — 52/221 1.7 3.7 61.0% 56.6% 42.1% 48.9% 48.8% 50.8% 42.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mashona Washington Lilia Osterloh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1994 1500 110.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.19 1996 1519 110.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.06
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1551 112.0 — — — — +33 — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.04
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1502 105.3 — — — — +38 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.07
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1546 126.1 — — — — +29 +17 +5 40.0% -0.98 4–2 (67%) — — -0.06
22 1998 1494 104.5 — — — — +27 — — 33.3% -1.11 0–1 1–1 — +0.08 2000 1596 120.7 — — — — -34 -49 +61 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 101.9 -0.05
23 1999 1506 104.0 — — — — +24 — — 47.4% -0.53 0–1 1–1 — +0.76 2001 1658 133.0 — — — — -4 -132 +27 49.5% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -0.27
24 2000 1481 104.4 — — — — +34 — — 26.9% -2.00 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.23 2002 1535 110.8 — — — — +102 -112 +96 29.3% -1.59 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.31
25 2001 1489 110.4 — — — — +28 — — 42.9% -0.86 0–1 — — -0.08 2003 1509 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.04
26 2002 1470 104.3 — — — — +40 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–1 1–1 — -0.30 2004 1561 130.0 — — — — +95 — — 47.6% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.58
27 2003 1441 96.8 — — — — +23 — — 26.7% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.24 2005 1488 99.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.703 41.7% +105 -60 — 28.0% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
28 2004 1581 124.4 -0.46 +0.14 0.897 47.0% -15 — — 51.8% +0.25 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — +0.41 2006 1510 110.3 -2.68 -0.13 0.914 47.9% +82 — — 46.9% -0.19 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 +0.94
29 2005 1586 116.5 +0.23 -0.86 0.949 48.9% -73 -83 +76 37.8% -0.89 7–5 (58%) 6–4 (60%) 107.0 -0.35 2007 1545 117.7 -3.39 +0.08 0.882 46.8% +27 — — 41.9% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.55
30 2006 1579 111.3 +0.23 -2.15 0.876 47.1% -56 -69 +67 38.9% -1.14 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -1.40 2008 1486 100.1 -3.07 -1.01 0.871 46.7% +64 -97 — 24.0% -1.44 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.06
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1511 100.3 -0.43 -1.46 0.901 48.5% +43 — — 40.0% -0.40 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.33
32 2008 1563 98.4 -1.32 -4.37 0.692 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01 2010 1468 100.5 -2.57 -3.96 0.740 43.5% +60 — — 18.8% -2.19 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
34 2010 1539 98.5 -1.16 -3.20 0.911 48.5% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1646 117.0 +0.07 -1.67 0.899 47.7% -13 -78 +74 38.5% -0.92 14–20 (41%) 15–9 (63%) 104.1 -0.29 — 1696 123.9 -2.71 -1.06 0.855 46.4% +34 -80 +48 39.2% -0.82 33–35 (49%) 16–27 (37%) 99.8 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.