H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mashona Washington vs Mariana Diaz-Oliva H2H: 0-1
Mariana Diaz-Oliva holds a 1–0 lead over Mashona Washington in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mariana Diaz-Oliva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mariana Diaz-Oliva won the 2005 Seoul third round 0-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | 0-6 7-5 6-3 | Mashona Washington | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mashona Washington | #990 | #50 | 676 | 1,647 | 42 | 76 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mariana Diaz-Oliva | #452 | #42 | 696 | 1,654 | 86 | 129 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mashona Washington | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #106 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #130 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #107 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #55 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #89 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #199 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #73 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #58 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #230 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #192 | 1,460 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #364 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |