H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mashona Washington vs Tatiana Perebiynis H2H: 1-0
Mashona Washington holds a 1–0 lead over Tatiana Perebiynis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mashona Washington leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mashona Washington won the 2004 Acapulco third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 43
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2004* | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Mashona Washington | 6-4 6-2 | Tatiana Perebiynis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mashona Washington | #990 | #50 | 676 | 1,647 | 42 | 76 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tatiana Perebiynis | #1,227 | #55 | 768 | 1,608 | 39 | 69 | 36.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mashona Washington | Tatiana Perebiynis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #78 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #91 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #214 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #130 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #97 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #867 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #199 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #73 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #230 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #364 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |