H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mathilde Johansson vs Michelle Larcher De Brito H2H: 0-1
Michelle Larcher De Brito holds a 1–0 lead over Mathilde Johansson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michelle Larcher De Brito leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michelle Larcher De Brito won the 2009 US Open first round 1-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POR
Age 33
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2009* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Michelle Larcher De Brito | 1-6 7-5 6-1 | Mathilde Johansson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mathilde Johansson | #235 | #59 | 992 | 1,619 | 44 | 75 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michelle Larcher De Brito | #1,216 | #76 | 821 | 1,630 | 30 | 42 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mathilde Johansson | Michelle Larcher De Brito | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #296 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #130 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #113 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #210 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #117 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #226 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #85 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #77 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2013 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #136 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |