H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Mayar Sherif vs Lauren Davis H2H: 2-1
Mayar Sherif holds a 2–1 lead over Lauren Davis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mayar Sherif leads 2–0 on clay, while Lauren Davis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mayar Sherif won the 2024 Madrid first round 4-6 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
EGY
Age 30
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2024* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R128 | Clay | Mayar Sherif | 4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | Lauren Davis | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2022* | Parma | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Mayar Sherif | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Lauren Davis | Match data |
| Mar 18, 2021* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Lauren Davis | 1-6 6-2 6-3 | Mayar Sherif | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayar Sherif | #97 | #31 | 1,385 | 1,831 | 43 | 77 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lauren Davis | #499 | #26 | 1,646 | 1,823 | 140 | 181 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mayar Sherif | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #88 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #61 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #128 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #52 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #87 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 1–13 | 7.1% | #109 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2026 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #97 | 1,763 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #362 | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |