H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Meghann Shaughnessy vs Anne Kremer H2H: 2-1

Meghann Shaughnessy holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Meghann Shaughnessy leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2001 Quebec City semifinal 7-6(5) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meghann Shaughnessy #12 7-6(5) 6-2 Anne Kremer #36 Match data Sep 22, 2001* SF Quebec City Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Meghann Shaughnessy #14 6-7(4) 6-2 6-1 Anne Kremer #33 Match data Aug 2, 2001* R32 San Diego Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Anne Kremer #31 6-3 6-3 Meghann Shaughnessy #99 Match data Jan 8, 2000* SF ASB Classic Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,903 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,438 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0
21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,651 0 1 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0
22 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,832 0 2 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0
23 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,738 0 2 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0
24 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,729 0 3 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2
25 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,662 0 3 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,566 0 3 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2
27 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2
28 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2
29 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,517 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,460 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,474 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Anne Kremer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 5 11 16 31.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2000 15 10 25 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2001 18 14 32 56.3% 15 7 22 68.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2002 16 15 31 51.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
24 2003 26 13 39 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2004 14 16 30 46.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 2005 9 15 24 37.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 2006 14 13 27 51.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 7 13 20 35.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
29 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2009 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 133 259 48.6% 74 67 141 52.5% 20 19 39 51.3% 13 14 27 48.1% — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 94/240 of Meghann Shaughnessy's and 41/71 of Anne Kremer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Anne Kremer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 2003 8/55 5.0 4.4 51.4% 71.2% 47.2% 53.9% 49.8% 59.4% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 6/42 6.5 6.7 50.5% 72.4% 42.1% 59.3% 38.6% 57.5% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 11/42 9.1 4.0 54.9% 77.0% 49.1% 57.4% 45.9% 64.4% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 21/47 4.4 5.3 55.4% 68.5% 45.4% 54.3% 38.1% 57.9% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 34/40 4.5 3.9 54.5% 70.0% 45.4% 56.8% 37.8% 58.6% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 5/5 3.0 3.0 54.3% 56.9% 45.0% 58.1% 50.8% 51.2% 37.7% 2005 5/18 2.4 1.6 69.3% 58.4% 35.9% 47.0% 58.1% 51.0% 43.0%
30 2009 9/9 5.1 2.6 46.3% 64.4% 45.7% 49.6% 31.2% 54.0% 33.6% 2006 5/12 0.8 3.0 62.0% 50.4% 41.6% 42.4% 30.3% 47.5% 42.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 12/20 1.3 2.7 70.8% 54.9% 43.4% 43.1% 45.8% 51.6% 42.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 9/10 1.0 3.8 62.2% 52.5% 39.7% 44.1% 42.5% 47.5% 42.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/4 0.7 4.7 60.9% 59.4% 32.9% 41.7% 30.0% 49.0% 36.5%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 7/7 1.7 2.6 66.0% 52.0% 38.2% 34.7% 59.6% 47.4% 38.2%
Career — 94/466 5.2 4.2 53.4% 69.5% 45.8% 55.6% 39.9% 58.3% 38.9% — 41/333 1.3 3.0 66.1% 54.1% 39.8% 42.2% 45.9% 49.2% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Anne Kremer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1996 1512 107.9 — — — — +9 +65 — 47.1% 0.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 1499 96.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1544 115.4 — — — — -48 +81 — 46.2% -0.03 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.65 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09
20 1999 1439 99.7 — — — — +16 +55 +130 36.5% -0.77 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 93.7 +2.27 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12
21 2000 1652 133.2 — — — — -10 -80 -108 54.2% +0.11 4–6 (40%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 +0.56 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53
22 2001 1832 151.0 — — — — -45 -52 -141 59.9% +0.71 15–6 (71%) 15–11 (58%) 110.5 +1.29 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65
23 2002 1738 139.5 — — — — +19 -30 -36 51.6% +0.17 9–9 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 94.1 +0.83 1999 1640 130.5 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35
24 2003 1730 144.7 +2.14 -0.89 0.995 50.1% +45 -9 — 57.6% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 7–10 (41%) 96.1 +1.17 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80
25 2004 1662 135.5 +1.00 -1.59 0.925 48.6% +19 +57 -22 50.0% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–8 (38%) 96.1 +1.24 2001 1695 135.0 — — — — +2 -55 +63 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14
26 2005 1566 122.3 +4.57 -2.35 1.103 51.7% +20 +69 +81 44.8% -0.34 4–9 (31%) 7–6 (54%) 94.8 +0.33 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24
27 2006 1709 130.5 +1.38 -2.93 0.947 48.9% -49 +14 — 55.0% +0.25 9–6 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 107.6 -1.20 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58
28 2007 1666 128.5 +1.99 -3.46 0.952 49.3% -76 +156 -17 47.7% -0.09 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 96.4 +0.26 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32
29 2008 1580 93.2 -2.35 -2.24 0.773 45.3% — +131 — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — -0.09 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09
30 2009 1534 114.6 -0.18 -4.49 0.730 44.3% -22 — — 23.8% -2.14 0–3 (0%) — — -0.71 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1517 118.0 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -37 +124 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.03
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1460 103.3 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +16 +103 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.27
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1474 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1463 94.3 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +14 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.19
Career — 1904 137.9 +1.67 -2.91 0.933 48.8% -6 +25 -17 50.9% +0.08 66–73 (47%) 56–61 (48%) 95.9 +1.59 — 1810 132.2 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +3 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.