H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Meghann Shaughnessy vs Anne Kremer H2H: 2-1
Meghann Shaughnessy holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Meghann Shaughnessy leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2001 Quebec City semifinal 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
LUX
Age 50
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2001* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Meghann Shaughnessy | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Anne Kremer | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2001* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-1 | Anne Kremer | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2000* | Auckland | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Anne Kremer | 6-3 6-3 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meghann Shaughnessy | #1,104 | #11 | 1,949 | 1,888 | 233 | 233 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Anne Kremer | #1,039 | #18 | 1,265 | 1,810 | 147 | 182 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Meghann Shaughnessy | Anne Kremer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #99 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #38 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #31 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #33 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2004 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #37 | 1,709 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #401 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #52 | 1,666 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #836 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #165 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2009 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #590 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #82 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #265 | 1,461 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #331 | 1,475 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #238 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 |