H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Meghann Shaughnessy vs Iroda Tulyaganova H2H: 1-0
Meghann Shaughnessy holds a 1–0 lead over Iroda Tulyaganova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Meghann Shaughnessy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2000 Shanghai final 7-6(2) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 44
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2000* | Shanghai | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 7-6(2) 7-5 | Iroda Tulyaganova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meghann Shaughnessy | #1,104 | #11 | 1,949 | 1,888 | 233 | 233 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Iroda Tulyaganova | #862 | #16 | 1,349 | 1,820 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Meghann Shaughnessy | Iroda Tulyaganova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #75 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1998 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #20 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1999 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #99 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #38 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #50 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2001 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #550 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2002 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #131 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2004 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #37 | 1,709 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #52 | 1,666 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #836 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #590 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |