H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Meghann Shaughnessy vs Laura Pous-Tio H2H: 1-1

Meghann Shaughnessy and Laura Pous-Tio are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Meghann Shaughnessy leads 1–0 on clay, while Laura Pous-Tio leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2007 Barcelona round of 16 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Laura Pous-Tio
Spain Age 41 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meghann Shaughnessy #49 7-5 6-4 Laura Pous-Tio #135 Match data Jun 15, 2007* R16 Barcelona Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Laura Pous-Tio #80 6-4 4-6 6-1 Meghann Shaughnessy #52 Match data Sep 15, 2005* R32 Bali Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,903 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Laura Pous-Tio #776 #72 930 1,620 41 62 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Laura Pous-Tio
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,438 0 0 2005 7–7 50.0% #90 1,542 0 0
21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,651 0 1 2006 6–14 30.0% #101 1,497 0 0
22 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,832 0 2 2007 3–6 33.3% #165 1,465 0 0
23 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,738 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,729 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,662 0 3 2010 6–6 50.0% #108 1,529 0 0
26 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,566 0 3 2011 13–15 46.4% #75 1,589 0 0
27 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5 2012 6–9 40.0% #157 1,545 0 0
28 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6 2015 0–1 0.0% #194 1,531 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2016 0–4 0.0% #287 1,427 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Laura Pous-Tio
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 5 11 16 31.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — —
21 2000 15 10 25 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2001 18 14 32 56.3% 15 7 22 68.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
23 2002 16 15 31 51.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 26 13 39 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 14 16 30 46.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2010 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2005 9 15 24 37.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2006 14 13 27 51.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2007 7 13 20 35.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 133 259 48.6% 74 67 141 52.5% 20 19 39 51.3% 13 14 27 48.1% — 4 19 23 17.4% 37 40 77 48.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 94/240 of Meghann Shaughnessy's and 71/89 of Laura Pous-Tio's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Laura Pous-Tio
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 12/20 1.1 3.2 65.7% 58.4% 48.6% 56.2% 41.7% 55.0% 43.2%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 6/9 1.3 5.2 58.3% 53.0% 43.7% 48.0% 63.9% 49.2% 46.9%
24 2003 8/55 5.0 4.4 51.4% 71.2% 47.2% 53.9% 49.8% 59.4% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 6/42 6.5 6.7 50.5% 72.4% 42.1% 59.3% 38.6% 57.5% 39.3% 2010 7/12 0.6 2.1 71.6% 57.1% 53.3% 52.3% 57.3% 55.3% 46.4%
26 2005 11/42 9.1 4.0 54.9% 77.0% 49.1% 57.4% 45.9% 64.4% 39.2% 2011 27/28 0.7 2.5 67.4% 55.1% 47.8% 54.8% 53.1% 52.8% 46.5%
27 2006 21/47 4.4 5.3 55.4% 68.5% 45.4% 54.3% 38.1% 57.9% 39.9% 2012 14/15 0.6 3.1 59.3% 61.5% 43.4% 55.3% 52.5% 54.0% 47.9%
28 2007 34/40 4.5 3.9 54.5% 70.0% 45.4% 56.8% 37.8% 58.6% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 5/5 3.0 3.0 54.3% 56.9% 45.0% 58.1% 50.8% 51.2% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 9/9 5.1 2.6 46.3% 64.4% 45.7% 49.6% 31.2% 54.0% 33.6% 2015 1/1 0.0 2.0 64.4% 51.1% 61.5% 37.5% 50.0% 54.8% 34.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 4/4 0.8 4.8 67.6% 54.9% 33.7% 40.6% 78.6% 48.2% 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Laura Pous-Tio
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1996 1512 107.9 — — — — +9 +65 — 47.1% 0.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 1499 96.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1544 115.4 — — — — -48 +81 — 46.2% -0.03 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 1439 99.7 — — — — +16 +55 +130 36.5% -0.77 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 93.7 +2.27 2005 1542 107.3 — — — — -41 +77 — 46.9% -0.56 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — -0.14
21 2000 1652 133.2 — — — — -10 -80 -108 54.2% +0.11 4–6 (40%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 +0.56 2006 1498 111.5 -0.72 -1.49 0.959 49.2% -43 +76 — 36.2% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 0–1 — -0.11
22 2001 1832 151.0 — — — — -45 -52 -141 59.9% +0.71 15–6 (71%) 15–11 (58%) 110.5 +1.29 2007 1466 95.5 -3.89 -0.40 0.924 48.0% — +65 — 35.0% -0.80 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.71
23 2002 1738 139.5 — — — — +19 -30 -36 51.6% +0.17 9–9 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 94.1 +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 1730 144.7 +2.14 -0.89 0.995 50.1% +45 -9 — 57.6% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 7–10 (41%) 96.1 +1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 1662 135.5 +1.00 -1.59 0.925 48.6% +19 +57 -22 50.0% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–8 (38%) 96.1 +1.24 2010 1530 117.0 -0.15 +1.25 1.039 51.0% — +51 — 53.3% +0.13 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.42
26 2005 1566 122.3 +4.57 -2.35 1.103 51.7% +20 +69 +81 44.8% -0.34 4–9 (31%) 7–6 (54%) 94.8 +0.33 2011 1590 119.1 -2.29 +2.09 0.985 49.8% -126 +36 — 44.3% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 2–6 (25%) 100.5 -0.55
27 2006 1709 130.5 +1.38 -2.93 0.947 48.9% -49 +14 — 55.0% +0.25 9–6 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 107.6 -1.20 2012 1545 107.7 -1.22 -0.13 1.041 51.1% -104 +94 — 40.6% -0.56 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.78
28 2007 1666 128.5 +1.99 -3.46 0.952 49.3% -76 +156 -17 47.7% -0.09 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 96.4 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1580 93.2 -2.35 -2.24 0.773 45.3% — +131 — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1534 114.6 -0.18 -4.49 0.730 44.3% -22 — — 23.8% -2.14 0–3 (0%) — — -0.71 2015 1531 100.6 -1.68 -0.81 0.759 45.0% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.03
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1428 94.0 -2.86 -3.40 0.805 45.3% -10 — — 11.1% -2.22 0–1 — — +0.53
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1414 96.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1904 137.9 +1.67 -2.91 0.933 48.8% -6 +25 -17 50.9% +0.08 66–73 (47%) 56–61 (48%) 95.9 +1.59 — 1621 111.6 -1.76 +0.40 0.977 49.6% -75 +62 — 41.2% -0.42 13–20 (39%) 8–15 (35%) 91.7 +0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.