H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Meghann Shaughnessy vs Paola Suarez H2H: 0-2
Paola Suarez holds a 2–0 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paola Suarez leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Paola Suarez won the 2002 Charleston third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2002* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Paola Suarez | 6-1 6-1 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
| Apr 11, 2002* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Paola Suarez | 6-1 1-6 6-0 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meghann Shaughnessy | #1,104 | #11 | 1,949 | 1,888 | 233 | 233 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,916 | 223 | 180 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Meghann Shaughnessy | Paola Suarez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #99 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #38 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #37 | 1,709 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #52 | 1,666 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #836 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2009 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #590 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |