H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Meilen Tu vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 1-0

Meilen Tu holds a 1–0 lead over Stephanie Foretz Gacon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 2002 Hobart International round of 16 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meilen Tu
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Stephanie Foretz Gacon
FRA Age 45 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meilen Tu #63 7-5 6-0 Stephanie Foretz Gacon Match data Jan 10, 2002* R16 Hobart International Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Meilen Tu #1,136 #35 769 1,692 103 163 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Stephanie Foretz Gacon — — — 1,647 61 115 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meilen Tu Stephanie Foretz Gacon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 2–3 40.0% #160 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1995 3–10 23.1% #161 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1996 2–3 40.0% #157 1,518 0 0 1999 1–2 33.3% — 1,511 0 0
19 1997 6–13 31.6% #81 1,520 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% — 1,513 0 0
20 1998 2–3 40.0% #209 1,533 0 0 2001 5–6 45.5% — 1,558 0 0
21 1999 3–11 21.4% #103 1,484 0 0 2002 11–12 47.8% — 1,604 0 0
22 2000 6–9 40.0% #67 1,576 0 0 2003 12–15 44.4% — 1,589 0 0
23 2001 25–23 52.1% #45 1,615 0 1 2004 3–10 23.1% — 1,532 0 0
24 2002 16–24 40.0% #73 1,561 0 1 2005 5–14 26.3% — 1,500 0 0
25 2003 4–14 22.2% #143 1,478 0 1 2006 5–14 26.3% — 1,443 0 0
26 2004 2–4 33.3% #162 1,464 0 1 2007 2–6 25.0% — 1,457 0 0
27 2005 4–9 30.8% #120 1,473 0 1 2008 0–2 0.0% — 1,455 0 0
28 2006 7–9 43.8% #90 1,532 0 1 2009 2–7 22.2% — 1,421 0 0
29 2007 20–22 47.6% #47 1,626 0 1 2010 0–3 0.0% — 1,401 0 0
30 2008 1–6 14.3% #630 1,548 0 1 2011 2–6 25.0% — 1,406 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2012 10–10 50.0% — 1,513 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2013 2–5 28.6% — 1,501 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Meilen Tu Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
19 1997 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2002 7 13 20 35.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2005 2 9 11 18.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
25 2003 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 3 5 8 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 96 156 38.5% 18 37 55 32.7% 17 17 34 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% — 31 59 90 34.4% 17 37 54 31.5% 11 17 28 39.3% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 58/96 of Meilen Tu's and 74/136 of Stephanie Foretz Gacon's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Meilen Tu Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 4/27 1.5 6.8 53.2% 54.0% 39.1% 53.8% 40.0% 47.2% 46.4%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/13 1.2 5.2 56.7% 53.9% 47.6% 47.1% 38.1% 51.2% 42.6%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 6/19 2.5 7.0 59.4% 57.9% 44.5% 44.9% 46.2% 52.7% 44.4%
25 2003 1/18 0.0 7.0 63.2% 53.5% 44.0% 36.4% 28.6% 50.0% 48.9% 2006 12/19 1.8 4.7 61.9% 55.5% 38.3% 47.5% 40.8% 49.8% 41.6%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/8 1.8 6.8 57.8% 60.3% 32.5% 55.1% 54.2% 48.5% 36.2%
27 2005 3/13 1.0 3.0 65.7% 52.1% 48.2% 55.9% 41.7% 50.6% 36.4% 2008 1/2 1.0 1.0 70.7% 58.5% 23.5% 33.3% 100.0% 48.3% 34.6%
28 2006 12/16 0.6 4.2 64.7% 58.3% 44.3% 43.8% 43.2% 53.3% 41.8% 2009 8/9 1.8 4.8 62.8% 61.0% 46.9% 44.2% 42.6% 55.2% 41.2%
29 2007 38/42 1.0 5.3 65.8% 62.7% 42.6% 55.8% 49.7% 55.8% 45.5% 2010 2/3 1.5 3.5 59.5% 52.1% 24.3% 28.6% 7.1% 41.4% 30.7%
30 2008 4/7 0.5 4.3 71.0% 55.8% 43.7% 52.5% 59.4% 52.2% 39.9% 2011 7/8 3.0 4.0 58.8% 58.6% 43.5% 50.7% 57.5% 52.6% 39.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 18/20 2.6 3.6 55.5% 63.4% 44.5% 58.3% 46.7% 55.2% 44.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/7 1.3 3.7 55.2% 52.9% 37.3% 36.4% 53.7% 46.0% 46.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 13.0 7.0 64.1% 73.8% 36.2% 50.0% 42.9% 60.3% 41.5%
Career — 58/266 0.9 4.9 65.9% 60.6% 43.3% 52.8% 48.2% 54.7% 43.9% — 74/176 2.2 4.7 58.5% 58.6% 41.4% 49.0% 45.9% 51.6% 42.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Meilen Tu Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1994 1543 126.0 — — — — +32 — — 45.5% -0.36 0–1 1–0 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 1506 118.5 — — — — +10 — +85 33.3% -0.47 0–6 (0%) 0–5 (0%) 91.1 -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1518 108.5 — — — — +9 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–0 — — +0.25 1999 1511 107.7 — — — — — +38 — 37.5% -1.38 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.39
19 1997 1520 114.3 — — — — +34 — — 37.0% -1.07 3–5 (38%) 2–0 — -0.01 2000 1513 105.7 — — — — — +27 — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–0 — +0.01
20 1998 1533 111.4 — — — — +25 — — 46.2% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.08 2001 1559 118.8 — — — — +31 -46 — 46.4% -0.04 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — -0.48
21 1999 1485 108.0 — — — — +29 -18 — 28.1% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.21 2002 1605 127.2 — — — — -4 -29 -66 50.0% -0.10 1–3 (25%) 5–1 (83%) 101.5 +0.03
22 2000 1576 129.8 — — — — -11 -88 — 35.5% -0.87 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -1.26 2003 1589 115.5 -3.06 +0.16 0.879 47.0% 0 -51 +46 43.3% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 104.2 +0.97
23 2001 1615 124.8 — — — — +19 -100 -43 50.4% +0.09 15–12 (56%) 6–13 (32%) 98.8 +2.97 2004 1532 111.6 -1.58 -0.22 0.873 47.0% -19 +10 — 31.3% -1.19 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 100.0 -0.31
24 2002 1562 120.2 — — — — +9 -52 +23 41.5% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 8–3 (73%) 98.2 +0.86 2005 1501 103.6 -0.99 -0.13 0.938 48.6% -44 -15 +148 29.3% -1.44 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 -0.82
25 2003 1478 102.5 -0.75 +0.07 0.979 49.4% +37 -53 — 27.9% -1.28 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.08 2006 1444 101.7 -4.22 -1.54 0.829 45.8% +32 -13 — 32.6% -1.22 3–5 (38%) 0–2 — +0.07
26 2004 1464 95.0 — — — — +44 — — 30.8% -1.77 1–0 1–0 — +0.51 2007 1457 115.6 -1.06 -2.17 0.702 42.7% +26 — — 27.8% -1.61 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.62
27 2005 1473 93.5 -1.15 -2.22 0.738 43.7% +25 — +71 35.7% -1.64 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.9 -0.07 2008 1455 106.9 +3.39 +4.25 0.669 41.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.46
28 2006 1532 114.0 -1.42 -1.20 0.896 47.6% -68 — +139 44.4% -0.92 2–2 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 103.6 +0.38 2009 1421 97.6 -0.52 -1.66 0.920 47.9% +55 -3 +137 30.4% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.41
29 2007 1627 128.6 +0.38 +1.07 1.029 50.8% -79 -65 +74 48.4% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 104.1 -0.11 2010 1402 102.9 -1.39 -0.34 0.524 35.8% — — — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.12
30 2008 1548 100.4 -1.42 -2.70 0.835 46.2% -63 — — 23.5% -1.47 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.20 2011 1407 106.9 -1.79 -0.90 0.842 46.7% +64 -4 — 31.6% -1.32 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1513 113.5 -0.88 +0.34 1.000 50.1% -12 -50 +63 52.3% -0.32 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.73
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1502 102.0 -3.63 +0.69 0.868 46.6% -19 -44 — 31.3% -1.38 1–1 1–0 — -0.10
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1491 103.0 -2.87 -1.23 1.046 51.0% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.03
Career — 1693 123.2 -0.22 +0.15 0.969 49.4% 0 -69 +60 40.9% -0.65 40–51 (44%) 34–31 (52%) 102.6 +1.17 — 1648 117.4 -1.86 -0.48 0.879 47.2% +3 -19 +71 38.2% -0.88 21–35 (38%) 21–15 (58%) 102.5 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.