H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Melanie Oudin vs Michelle Larcher De Brito H2H: 1-1
Melanie Oudin and Michelle Larcher De Brito are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Michelle Larcher De Brito won the 2013 Wimbledon first round 7-6(7) 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
POR
Age 33
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2013* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Michelle Larcher De Brito | 7-6(7) 1-6 6-4 | Melanie Oudin | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2012* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Melanie Oudin | 6-3 6-4 | Michelle Larcher De Brito | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melanie Oudin | #428 | #31 | 1,644 | 1,710 | 53 | 78 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Michelle Larcher De Brito | #1,216 | #76 | 821 | 1,630 | 30 | 42 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Melanie Oudin | Michelle Larcher De Brito | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #296 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #130 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #178 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #113 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2009 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #48 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #210 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2010 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #61 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2011 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #84 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #117 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #157 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #226 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |