H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Melinda Czink vs Amy Frazier H2H: 0-1

Amy Frazier holds a 1–0 lead over Melinda Czink in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2006 Wimbledon second round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Melinda Czink
HUN Age 43 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 29, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Amy Frazier #80 6-2 6-3 Melinda Czink #77 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Melinda Czink #691 #37 1,571 1,794 89 136 39.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Melinda Czink Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2
18 — — — — — — — 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3
20 2003 4–3 57.1% #79 1,568 0 0 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3
21 2004 2–15 11.8% #128 1,427 0 0 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4
22 2005 9–12 42.9% #96 1,478 0 0 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5
23 2006 14–18 43.8% #105 1,500 0 0 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5
24 2007 3–9 25.0% #124 1,456 0 0 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5
25 2008 10–11 47.6% #106 1,558 0 0 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 2009 29–21 58.0% #37 1,741 0 1 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6
27 2010 3–16 15.8% #312 1,524 0 1 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6
28 2011 3–6 33.3% #143 1,519 0 1 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6
29 2012 9–16 36.0% #94 1,543 0 1 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2013 3–9 25.0% #254 1,499 0 1 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8