H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Melinda Czink vs Anna Smashnova H2H: 1-1
Melinda Czink and Anna Smashnova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Melinda Czink won the 2005 Canberra fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 43
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 50
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2005* | Canberra | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Melinda Czink | 6-2 6-1 | Anna Smashnova | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2004* | Stockholm | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anna Smashnova | 6-2 6-1 | Melinda Czink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melinda Czink | #691 | #37 | 1,571 | 1,794 | 89 | 136 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anna Smashnova | #994 | #15 | 1,616 | 1,882 | 242 | 221 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Melinda Czink | Anna Smashnova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #236 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #68 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #132 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #128 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #105 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2007 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #88 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2008 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #106 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 43–25 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2009 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,857 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2010 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #94 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,700 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #254 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #921 | 1,648 | 0 | 12 |