H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Melinda Czink vs Julie Ditty H2H: 2-0
Melinda Czink holds a 2–0 lead over Julie Ditty in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Melinda Czink leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Melinda Czink won the 2008 Quebec City fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 43
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2008* | Quebec City | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Melinda Czink | 6-1 6-1 | Julie Ditty | Match data |
| Jul 30, 2008* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Melinda Czink | 7-6(4) 6-0 | Julie Ditty | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melinda Czink | #691 | #37 | 1,571 | 1,794 | 89 | 136 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Julie Ditty | #674 | #89 | 620 | 1,544 | 10 | 28 | 26.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Melinda Czink | Julie Ditty | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #128 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #105 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #106 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #101 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #94 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #113 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #254 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #310 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #289 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #456 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |