H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Melinda Czink vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 0-1
Katarina Srebotnik holds a 1–0 lead over Melinda Czink in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Katarina Srebotnik leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Katarina Srebotnik won the 2008 Prague fourth round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 43
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2008* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Katarina Srebotnik | 6-0 6-2 | Melinda Czink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melinda Czink | #691 | #37 | 1,571 | 1,794 | 89 | 136 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Melinda Czink | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2004 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #128 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2005 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2006 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #105 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2007 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2008 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #106 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2009 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2010 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #94 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #254 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |