H2H data updated: 2026-09-24 00:00 UTC

Melinda Czink vs Kimiko Date H2H: 0-1

Kimiko Date holds a 1–0 lead over Melinda Czink in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimiko Date leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 2010 Indian Wells Open first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Melinda Czink
HUN Age 43 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kimiko Date #62 6-2 6-2 Melinda Czink #46 Match data Mar 12, 2010* R128 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Melinda Czink #691 #37 1,571 1,796 89 137 39.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,092 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 2 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Melinda Czink Kimiko Date
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0
20 2003 4–3 57.1% #79 1,568 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,724 0 0
21 2004 2–16 11.1% #128 1,427 0 0 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1
22 2005 9–12 42.9% #96 1,478 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,947 0 2
23 2006 14–18 43.8% #105 1,500 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4
24 2007 3–9 25.0% #124 1,456 0 0 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,029 0 5
25 2008 10–11 47.6% #106 1,558 0 0 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,077 0 7
26 2009 29–21 58.0% #37 1,758 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2010 3–16 15.8% #312 1,533 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2011 3–6 33.3% #143 1,525 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2012 9–16 36.0% #94 1,543 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2013 3–9 25.0% #254 1,500 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,573 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Melinda Czink Kimiko Date
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2004 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2005 9 6 15 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
25 2008 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 3 9 12 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 56 77 133 42.1% 22 44 66 33.3% 11 16 27 40.7% — — — — — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Melinda Czink Kimiko Date
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -9 — +53 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +1.20
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1665 128.2 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) — -0.03
20 2003 1568 119.7 -0.23 +0.05 0.875 46.6% +6 -6 — 44.4% -0.50 4–0 (100%) 1–0 — -0.33 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -22 — -81 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 +0.73
21 2004 1428 98.7 -0.95 -0.17 0.894 47.4% +79 +17 — 21.4% -2.07 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.23 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -209 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) 104.6 -0.72
22 2005 1478 105.8 -1.18 -2.27 0.558 37.9% +88 -105 — 41.7% -0.67 4–2 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 +0.54 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) 105.3 -0.46
23 2006 1501 112.0 -1.09 -1.39 0.950 49.1% +30 -48 +15 45.9% -0.36 6–6 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 +1.02 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 -0.33
24 2007 1457 101.5 -0.83 -2.90 0.821 45.7% +57 -51 — 31.0% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 +0.11 1995 2030 160.2 — — — — +41 -192 -291 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) 104.6 -2.22
25 2008 1559 122.7 +0.81 -3.19 0.920 48.5% +7 -110 -18 47.9% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.0 +0.10 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 -0.42
26 2009 1759 133.3 +2.15 -0.64 1.020 50.5% -34 -162 -152 58.7% +0.35 9–10 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 104.0 -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 1533 110.0 -1.99 -4.02 0.807 45.6% +115 -53 +11 23.3% -1.44 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.8 -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 1526 106.8 +0.76 +0.06 0.926 48.6% +77 — +41 40.9% -0.68 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.2 +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 1544 120.7 +2.01 -3.55 0.942 49.0% +9 -66 +104 40.7% -0.48 3–6 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 1500 108.6 -0.99 -4.61 0.816 46.1% +48 -61 — 30.0% -1.37 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2049 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +25 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) 87.7 -0.84
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 107.5 -3.09
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) 88.8 -2.48
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.10
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 93.6 -0.50
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1597 125.2 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +178 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) 97.7 -0.26
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1574 113.0 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1564 90.3 +0.60 +0.07 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.16
Career — 1796 120.5 +0.70 -2.25 0.922 48.4% +30 -76 -4 42.0% -0.58 39–45 (46%) 29–32 (48%) 99.0 -0.24 — 2093 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) 95.3 -2.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.