H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Melinda Czink vs Maria Vento-Kabchi H2H: 1-1
Melinda Czink and Maria Vento-Kabchi are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Vento-Kabchi leads 1–0 on clay, while Melinda Czink leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Vento-Kabchi won the 2004 Vienna third round 4-6 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 43
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
VEN
Age 52
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2004* | Vienna | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Maria Vento-Kabchi | 4-6 6-0 6-2 | Melinda Czink | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Melinda Czink | 6-4 6-3 | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melinda Czink | #691 | #37 | 1,571 | 1,794 | 89 | 136 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Maria Vento-Kabchi | #996 | #26 | 1,053 | 1,716 | 95 | 156 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Melinda Czink | Maria Vento-Kabchi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #166 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #128 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #86 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #139 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #105 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #43 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #106 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #110 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #94 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #44 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #254 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #48 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |