H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Melinda Czink vs Marlene Weingartner H2H: 1-0

Melinda Czink holds a 1–0 lead over Marlene Weingartner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Melinda Czink leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Melinda Czink won the 2005 Canberra quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Melinda Czink
HUN Age 43 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Marlene Weingartner
GER Age 46 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Melinda Czink #128 6-3 6-4 Marlene Weingartner #77 Match data Jan 15, 2005* QF Canberra Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Melinda Czink #691 #37 1,571 1,796 89 137 39.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Marlene Weingartner #1,051 #36 808 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Melinda Czink Marlene Weingartner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1995 1–4 20.0% #231 1,480 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #211 1,471 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 3–7 30.0% #127 1,467 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 4–4 50.0% #104 1,510 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1999 7–14 33.3% #92 1,532 0 0
20 2003 4–3 57.1% #79 1,568 0 0 2000 6–15 28.6% #87 1,493 0 0
21 2004 2–16 11.1% #128 1,427 0 0 2001 21–26 44.7% #42 1,545 0 0
22 2005 9–12 42.9% #96 1,478 0 0 2002 9–20 31.0% #97 1,482 0 0
23 2006 14–18 43.8% #105 1,500 0 0 2003 17–15 53.1% #47 1,645 0 0
24 2007 3–9 25.0% #124 1,456 0 0 2004 13–17 43.3% #71 1,630 0 0
25 2008 10–11 47.6% #106 1,558 0 0 2005 3–11 21.4% #381 1,509 0 0
26 2009 29–21 58.0% #37 1,758 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2010 3–16 15.8% #312 1,533 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2011 3–6 33.3% #143 1,525 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2012 9–16 36.0% #94 1,543 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2013 3–9 25.0% #254 1,500 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Melinda Czink Marlene Weingartner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 3 5 8 37.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2004 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2001 13 17 30 43.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 2005 9 6 15 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 12 7 19 63.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 8 12 20 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2008 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 3 9 12 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 56 77 133 42.1% 22 44 66 33.3% 11 16 27 40.7% — — — — — 48 67 115 41.7% 26 43 69 37.7% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 9 12 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 143/226 of Melinda Czink's and 15/76 of Marlene Weingartner's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Melinda Czink Marlene Weingartner
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 3/7 1.0 1.7 65.3% 58.7% 40.7% 45.8% 31.9% 52.1% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 4/18 1.0 2.0 70.2% 54.4% 42.8% 39.0% 56.8% 50.8% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 1/21 1.0 4.0 71.4% 54.3% 28.6% 50.0% 100.0% 46.9% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 6/32 2.0 3.3 71.5% 59.4% 46.2% 60.2% 50.6% 55.2% 42.5% 2003 5/32 2.2 5.0 57.8% 58.0% 37.5% 44.3% 45.1% 49.6% 38.7%
24 2007 4/12 1.0 4.5 62.6% 62.1% 45.1% 40.4% 36.1% 55.8% 36.3% 2004 6/30 1.5 3.8 60.6% 56.0% 42.2% 52.5% 40.6% 50.6% 47.1%
25 2008 16/21 2.8 5.2 62.8% 66.0% 42.4% 50.4% 55.5% 57.1% 39.5% 2005 4/14 1.5 7.3 55.1% 62.2% 40.5% 50.3% 35.4% 51.9% 38.3%
26 2009 44/50 3.5 5.5 61.7% 64.9% 47.8% 49.9% 51.8% 58.1% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 19/19 2.8 6.3 61.0% 61.3% 39.9% 46.1% 28.6% 52.9% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 9/9 2.3 6.8 61.8% 61.7% 47.4% 43.6% 45.3% 56.0% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 25/25 2.7 4.2 59.6% 64.5% 48.9% 53.6% 46.3% 58.1% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 12/12 3.3 4.7 62.4% 63.3% 40.1% 50.6% 43.7% 54.8% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 143/226 2.8 5.0 62.2% 63.3% 45.1% 49.5% 46.6% 56.3% 40.3% — 15/218 1.7 5.1 58.2% 58.3% 40.2% 49.2% 40.7% 50.6% 41.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Melinda Czink Marlene Weingartner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1481 101.2 — — — — — +75 — 27.3% -1.82 0–1 0–1 — +0.10
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1471 99.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — 0.00
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1467 106.7 — — — — +25 +97 — 34.8% -1.48 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.51
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1511 116.1 — — — — +6 +47 — 50.0% -0.06 2–0 0–2 — +0.31
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1533 112.0 — — — — +6 +11 — 34.8% -1.74 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — -0.40
20 2003 1568 119.7 -0.23 +0.05 0.875 46.6% +6 -6 — 44.4% -0.50 4–0 (100%) 1–0 — -0.33 2000 1493 99.2 — — — — -1 +8 — 28.3% -1.70 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.9 +0.79
21 2004 1428 98.7 -0.95 -0.17 0.894 47.4% +79 +17 — 21.4% -2.07 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.23 2001 1546 121.6 — — — — -18 +20 +50 45.5% -0.49 8–8 (50%) 9–2 (82%) 106.9 +0.06
22 2005 1478 105.8 -1.18 -2.27 0.558 37.9% +88 -105 — 41.7% -0.67 4–2 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 +0.54 2002 1483 114.9 — — — — +47 +8 +62 35.5% -1.16 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 +0.40
23 2006 1501 112.0 -1.09 -1.39 0.950 49.1% +30 -48 +15 45.9% -0.36 6–6 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 +1.02 2003 1646 127.8 -1.25 -1.46 0.767 44.3% +19 -99 -81 48.5% -0.44 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.8 -0.63
24 2007 1457 101.5 -0.83 -2.90 0.821 45.7% +57 -51 — 31.0% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 +0.11 2004 1631 114.1 -1.58 +1.70 0.953 48.5% -17 -24 — 43.1% -0.66 5–2 (71%) 1–3 (25%) 102.5 -0.71
25 2008 1559 122.7 +0.81 -3.19 0.920 48.5% +7 -110 -18 47.9% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.0 +0.10 2005 1510 107.7 -1.33 -2.67 0.796 45.2% +66 +24 — 31.3% -1.25 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.5 -0.27
26 2009 1759 133.3 +2.15 -0.64 1.020 50.5% -34 -162 -152 58.7% +0.35 9–10 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 104.0 -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 1533 110.0 -1.99 -4.02 0.807 45.6% +115 -53 +11 23.3% -1.44 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.8 -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 1526 106.8 +0.76 +0.06 0.926 48.6% +77 — +41 40.9% -0.68 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.2 +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 1544 120.7 +2.01 -3.55 0.942 49.0% +9 -66 +104 40.7% -0.48 3–6 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 1500 108.6 -0.99 -4.61 0.816 46.1% +48 -61 — 30.0% -1.37 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1796 120.5 +0.70 -2.25 0.922 48.4% +30 -76 -4 42.0% -0.58 39–45 (46%) 29–32 (48%) 99.0 -0.24 — 1679 119.1 -1.40 -0.52 0.849 46.2% +9 +7 +7 39.8% -0.95 33–27 (55%) 17–21 (45%) 106.9 +0.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.