H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Melinda Czink vs Mathilde Johansson H2H: 0-1
Mathilde Johansson holds a 1–0 lead over Melinda Czink in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mathilde Johansson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mathilde Johansson won the 2013 Charleston second round 5-7 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 43
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2013* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Mathilde Johansson | 5-7 6-3 7-5 | Melinda Czink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melinda Czink | #691 | #37 | 1,571 | 1,794 | 89 | 136 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mathilde Johansson | #235 | #59 | 992 | 1,619 | 44 | 75 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Melinda Czink | Mathilde Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #128 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #105 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #85 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #106 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #77 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #136 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #94 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #254 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |