H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Melinda Czink vs Rushmi Chakravarthi H2H: 1-0

Melinda Czink holds a 1–0 lead over Rushmi Chakravarthi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Melinda Czink leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Melinda Czink won the 2006 Bangalore round of 32 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Melinda Czink
HUN Age 43 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Rushmi Chakravarthi
IND Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Melinda Czink #113 6-1 6-2 Rushmi Chakravarthi #372 Match data Feb 16, 2006* R32 Bangalore Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Melinda Czink #691 #37 1,571 1,796 89 137 39.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Rushmi Chakravarthi #1,212 #310 74 1,500 0 3 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Melinda Czink Rushmi Chakravarthi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2003 4–3 57.1% #79 1,568 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2004 2–16 11.1% #128 1,427 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2005 9–12 42.9% #96 1,478 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2006 14–18 43.8% #105 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2007 3–9 25.0% #124 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2008 10–11 47.6% #106 1,558 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2009 29–21 58.0% #37 1,758 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2010 3–16 15.8% #312 1,533 0 1 2005 0–1 0.0% #365 1,486 0 0
28 2011 3–6 33.3% #143 1,525 0 1 2006 0–2 0.0% #424 1,461 0 0
29 2012 9–16 36.0% #94 1,543 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2013 3–9 25.0% #254 1,500 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Melinda Czink Rushmi Chakravarthi
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 9 6 15 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2011 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2012 3 9 12 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 56 77 133 42.1% 22 44 66 33.3% 11 16 27 40.7% — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Melinda Czink Rushmi Chakravarthi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2003 1568 119.7 -0.23 +0.05 0.875 46.6% +6 -6 — 44.4% -0.50 4–0 (100%) 1–0 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 1428 98.7 -0.95 -0.17 0.894 47.4% +79 +17 — 21.4% -2.07 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 1478 105.8 -1.18 -2.27 0.558 37.9% +88 -105 — 41.7% -0.67 4–2 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 1501 112.0 -1.09 -1.39 0.950 49.1% +30 -48 +15 45.9% -0.36 6–6 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 1457 101.5 -0.83 -2.90 0.821 45.7% +57 -51 — 31.0% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 1559 122.7 +0.81 -3.19 0.920 48.5% +7 -110 -18 47.9% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.0 +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 1759 133.3 +2.15 -0.64 1.020 50.5% -34 -162 -152 58.7% +0.35 9–10 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 104.0 -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 1533 110.0 -1.99 -4.02 0.807 45.6% +115 -53 +11 23.3% -1.44 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.8 -0.52 2005 1486 94.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.03
28 2011 1526 106.8 +0.76 +0.06 0.926 48.6% +77 — +41 40.9% -0.68 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.2 +0.11 2006 1462 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — +0.03
29 2012 1544 120.7 +2.01 -3.55 0.942 49.0% +9 -66 +104 40.7% -0.48 3–6 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 1500 108.6 -0.99 -4.61 0.816 46.1% +48 -61 — 30.0% -1.37 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1796 120.5 +0.70 -2.25 0.922 48.4% +30 -76 -4 42.0% -0.58 39–45 (46%) 29–32 (48%) 99.0 -0.24 — 1500 94.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +2.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.