H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Melinda Czink vs Sania Mirza H2H: 1-1
Melinda Czink and Sania Mirza are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sania Mirza leads 1–0 on grass, while Melinda Czink leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sania Mirza won the 2009 Birmingham quarterfinal 6-1 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 43
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
IND
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2009* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Sania Mirza | 6-1 7-6(4) | Melinda Czink | Match data |
| Sep 23, 2005* | Kolkata | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Melinda Czink | 0-6 6-4 6-4 | Sania Mirza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melinda Czink | #691 | #37 | 1,571 | 1,794 | 89 | 136 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,819 | 121 | 117 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Melinda Czink | Sania Mirza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2004 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #128 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2005 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #105 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2007 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2008 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #106 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #94 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #254 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |