H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Melinda Czink vs Tathiana Garbin H2H: 2-3

Tathiana Garbin holds a 3–2 lead over Melinda Czink in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Tathiana Garbin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Melinda Czink won the 2009 Hobart third round 6-2 1-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Melinda Czink
HUN Age 43 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 15, 2009* Hobart WTA 250 R32 Hard Melinda Czink #100 6-2 1-6 7-5 Tathiana Garbin #52 Match data
Sep 11, 2008* Bali WTA 500 R32 Hard Tathiana Garbin #62 6-2 7-6(3) Melinda Czink #120 Match data
Oct 13, 2005* Bangkok WTA 500 R32 Hard Melinda Czink #103 6-3 4-6 6-1 Tathiana Garbin #86 Match data
Apr 29, 2004* Budapest WTA 250 R32 Clay Tathiana Garbin #84 6-3 3-6 6-4 Melinda Czink #64 Match data
Mar 25, 2004* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Tathiana Garbin #81 6-3 6-3 Melinda Czink #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Melinda Czink #691 #37 1,571 1,794 89 136 39.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,710 167 207 44.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Melinda Czink Tathiana Garbin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2003 4–3 57.1% #79 1,568 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2004 2–15 11.8% #128 1,427 0 0 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0
22 2005 9–12 42.9% #96 1,478 0 0 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,468 0 0
23 2006 14–18 43.8% #105 1,500 0 0 2000 23–19 54.8% #42 1,629 0 1
24 2007 3–9 25.0% #124 1,456 0 0 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,577 0 1
25 2008 10–11 47.6% #106 1,558 0 0 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1
26 2009 29–21 58.0% #37 1,741 0 1 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,557 0 1
27 2010 3–16 15.8% #312 1,524 0 1 2004 11–18 37.9% #58 1,535 0 1
28 2011 3–6 33.3% #143 1,519 0 1 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,557 0 1
29 2012 9–16 36.0% #94 1,543 0 1 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,628 0 1
30 2013 3–9 25.0% #254 1,499 0 1 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,647 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,597 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,575 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,569 0 1