H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Melinda Czink vs Yoon Jeong Cho H2H: 0-1
Yoon Jeong Cho holds a 1–0 lead over Melinda Czink in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yoon Jeong Cho leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yoon Jeong Cho won the 2006 Canberra quarterfinal 4-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 43
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2006* | Canberra | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Yoon Jeong Cho | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Melinda Czink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melinda Czink | #691 | #37 | 1,571 | 1,794 | 89 | 136 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Yoon Jeong Cho | #1,416 | #45 | 740 | 1,704 | 45 | 58 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Melinda Czink | Yoon Jeong Cho | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #128 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #105 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #115 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #106 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #83 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #75 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #94 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #265 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #254 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1416 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |