H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mercedes Paz vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 0-1
Patricia Medrado holds a 1–0 lead over Mercedes Paz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Medrado leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Patricia Medrado won the 1987 Guaruja quarterfinal 2-6 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 69
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 1987* | Guaruja | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Patricia Medrado | 2-6 7-5 6-0 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mercedes Paz | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |