H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Michaella Krajicek vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 1-0
Michaella Krajicek holds a 1–0 lead over Iveta Benesova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michaella Krajicek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michaella Krajicek won the 2006 Hobart final 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2006* | Hobart | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Michaella Krajicek | 6-2 6-1 | Iveta Benesova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michaella Krajicek | #1,134 | #30 | 918 | 1,803 | 89 | 98 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Iveta Benesova | #671 | #25 | 1,811 | 1,760 | 177 | 221 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michaella Krajicek | Iveta Benesova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2005 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #35 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #33 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #203 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #132 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #145 | 1,505 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #36 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2011 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #93 | 1,589 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #167 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #58 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #282 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,549 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #38 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #59 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #54 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #671 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |