H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Michaella Krajicek vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 3-0
Michaella Krajicek holds a 3–0 lead over Stephanie Foretz Gacon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Michaella Krajicek leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michaella Krajicek won the 2006 Budapest third round 6-1 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Age 45
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2006* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Michaella Krajicek | 6-1 5-7 6-1 | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2006* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Michaella Krajicek | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Michaella Krajicek | 6-2 6-1 | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michaella Krajicek | #1,134 | #30 | 918 | 1,803 | 89 | 98 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Stephanie Foretz Gacon | — | — | — | 1,647 | 61 | 115 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michaella Krajicek | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2005 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #35 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #33 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #203 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #145 | 1,505 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #93 | 1,589 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #167 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #282 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,549 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |