H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Michaella Krajicek vs Zi Yan H2H: 1-0
Michaella Krajicek holds a 1–0 lead over Zi Yan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michaella Krajicek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michaella Krajicek won the 2006 Miami first round 6-3 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
HKG
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2006* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Michaella Krajicek | 6-3 5-7 6-1 | Zi Yan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michaella Krajicek | #1,134 | #30 | 918 | 1,803 | 89 | 98 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Zi Yan | #789 | #40 | 678 | 1,634 | 34 | 57 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Michaella Krajicek | Zi Yan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #35 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #104 | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #33 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #166 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #203 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #145 | 1,505 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #93 | 1,589 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #167 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #282 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,549 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |