H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Michelle Larcher De Brito vs Melanie South H2H: 1-0
Michelle Larcher De Brito holds a 1–0 lead over Melanie South in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michelle Larcher De Brito leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michelle Larcher De Brito won the 2009 Roland Garros first round 0-6 7-6(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POR
Age 33
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 40
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Michelle Larcher De Brito | 0-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | Melanie South | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelle Larcher De Brito | #1,216 | #76 | 821 | 1,630 | 30 | 42 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Melanie South | #1,252 | #99 | 672 | 1,564 | 9 | 21 | 30.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michelle Larcher De Brito | Melanie South | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #296 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2008 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #130 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2009 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #113 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #210 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #117 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #226 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #110 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #189 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #639 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |