H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Michelle Tyler vs Anne Hobbs H2H: 0-2
Anne Hobbs holds a 2–0 lead over Michelle Tyler in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Hobbs leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Hobbs won the 1979 Eastbourne second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 68
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 1979* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Anne Hobbs | 6-1 6-4 | Michelle Tyler | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1976* | Perth Scotland | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Anne Hobbs | 6-4 6-4 | Michelle Tyler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelle Tyler | — | — | — | 1,893 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Anne Hobbs | #583 | #35 | 18 | 1,842 | 174 | 164 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michelle Tyler | Anne Hobbs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1976 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1977 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1978 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1979 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1982 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,736 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,777 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,679 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,609 | 0 | 8 |