H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:30 UTC
Mihaela Buzarnescu vs Lauren Davis H2H: 1-0
Mihaela Buzarnescu holds a 1–0 lead over Lauren Davis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mihaela Buzarnescu leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mihaela Buzarnescu won the 2019 Charleston third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 38
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2019* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Mihaela Buzarnescu | 6-3 6-2 | Lauren Davis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mihaela Buzarnescu | #798 | #20 | 2,068 | 1,872 | 58 | 63 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Lauren Davis | #499 | #26 | 1,646 | 1,823 | 140 | 181 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mihaela Buzarnescu | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #88 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #61 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #87 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2018 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #24 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2019 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #113 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #362 | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #404 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |