H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mima Jausovec vs Bettina Bunge H2H: 2-2
Mima Jausovec and Bettina Bunge are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Bettina Bunge leads 2–0 on carpet, while Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bettina Bunge won the 1981 Tokyo Sillook semifinal 6-2 1-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 69
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 63
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 1981* | Tokyo Sillook | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Bettina Bunge | 6-2 1-6 7-6 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1981* | Dallas | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Bettina Bunge | 6-3 6-2 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Nov 28, 1980* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Mima Jausovec | 6-4 6-3 | Bettina Bunge | Match data |
| Sep 12, 1980* | Tokyo Sillook | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Mima Jausovec | 6-2 6-4 | Bettina Bunge | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mima Jausovec | #400 | #23 | 2 | 2,088 | 339 | 246 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Bettina Bunge | #135 | #8 | 58 | 2,123 | 294 | 182 | 61.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mima Jausovec | Bettina Bunge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1972 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1974 | 18–13 | 58.1% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 31–23 | 57.4% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 50–23 | 68.5% | — | 2,023 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1977 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,008 | 1 | 5 | 1983 | 26–11 | 70.3% | — | 2,012 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1978 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 6 | 1984 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1979 | 32–28 | 53.3% | — | 1,866 | 1 | 6 | 1985 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1980 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 6 | 1986 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1981 | 57–28 | 67.1% | — | 2,010 | 1 | 6 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1982 | 36–24 | 60.0% | — | 1,861 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1983 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,873 | 1 | 7 | 1989 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #72 | 1,903 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1984 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #87 | 1,747 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,695 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,673 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #233 | 1,656 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #362 | 1,641 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |