H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Bettina Bunge H2H: 2-2

Mima Jausovec and Bettina Bunge are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Bettina Bunge leads 2–0 on carpet, while Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bettina Bunge won the 1981 Tokyo Sillook semifinal 6-2 1-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Bettina Bunge
GER Age 63 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bettina Bunge 6-2 1-6 7-6 Mima Jausovec Match data Sep 19, 1981* SF Tokyo Sillook WTA 250 Carpet
Bettina Bunge 6-3 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data Mar 14, 1981* QF Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-4 6-3 Bettina Bunge Match data Nov 28, 1980* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Mima Jausovec 6-2 6-4 Bettina Bunge Match data Sep 12, 1980* R16 Tokyo Sillook WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec — #23 2 2,092 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Bettina Bunge — #7 58 2,121 294 182 61.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Bettina Bunge
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 1978 2–2 50.0% — 1,533 0 0
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1979 16–20 44.4% — 1,699 0 0
17 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1 1980 31–23 57.4% — 1,885 0 0
18 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1 1981 50–23 68.5% #9 2,027 0 0
19 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,006 0 4 1982 43–21 67.2% #9 2,011 0 4
20 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5 1983 26–11 70.3% #7 2,010 0 5
21 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6 1984 28–21 57.1% #21 1,909 0 5
22 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,872 1 6 1985 25–17 59.5% — 1,846 0 5
23 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,947 1 6 1986 34–20 63.0% #12 2,016 0 5
24 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,015 1 6 1987 32–19 62.7% #15 1,936 0 5
25 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,859 1 7 — — — — — — —
26 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,874 1 7 1989 7–5 58.3% #72 1,927 0 5
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,748 1 7 — — — — — — —
28 1985 9–12 42.9% — 1,695 1 7 — — — — — — —
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 — — — — — — —
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 — — — — — — —
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Bettina Bunge
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1979 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 11 10 21 52.4%
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 25 11 36 69.4%
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1982 6 3 9 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7%
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1983 — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2%
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1984 8 4 12 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1985 9 5 14 64.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% 1986 8 5 13 61.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 13 8 21 61.9%
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7% 1987 14 5 19 73.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1%
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1989 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% — 73 41 114 64.0% 55 36 91 60.4% 63 35 98 64.3% 100 70 170 58.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Bettina Bunge
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55 1978 1533 104.3 — — — — +86 — — 55.6% -0.22 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.06
16 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.17 1979 1699 137.7 — — — — -79 -104 +10 45.0% -0.31 5–5 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 104.2 +0.20
17 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -2.15 1980 1885 156.5 — — — — -84 -197 -79 57.3% +0.69 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 102.0 -5.93
18 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -2.20 1981 2027 161.4 — — — — 0 -285 -113 64.3% +1.20 12–7 (63%) 11–2 (85%) 110.3 -3.43
19 1976 2006 156.7 — — — — -269 +59 -235 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -4.08 1982 2011 162.0 — — — — -24 -182 -43 64.0% +1.24 7–5 (58%) 6–10 (38%) 98.2 -3.95
20 1977 2011 161.8 — — — — -204 +129 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.46 1983 2011 158.7 — — — — +80 -107 -72 69.6% +1.56 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 -1.66
21 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -139 +160 -130 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 -4.09 1984 1909 146.3 — — — — +51 -109 +54 56.4% +0.62 8–6 (57%) 9–5 (64%) 102.9 -3.24
22 1979 1873 146.6 — — — — -11 +165 -111 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.9 +0.01 1985 1847 154.1 — — — — +42 -10 +97 61.1% +1.04 3–5 (38%) 4–6 (40%) 96.3 -2.92
23 1980 1947 156.3 — — — — +4 +49 -112 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.84 1986 2016 163.3 — — — — +9 -153 -24 59.2% +0.74 11–6 (65%) 8–6 (57%) 106.1 -5.55
24 1981 2015 157.3 — — — — -1 +4 -104 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.23 1987 1936 153.3 — — — — +62 -100 +10 62.7% +1.05 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 -1.05
25 1982 1859 148.8 — — — — +114 +111 -67 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 +1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 1875 144.0 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.60 1989 1928 139.1 — — — — +25 — — 57.7% +0.77 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 99.1 -0.42
27 1984 1748 131.8 — — — — -26 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1696 127.7 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1674 105.7 — — — — — +196 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1657 107.2 — — — — — +178 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1642 110.1 — — — — — +161 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2093 156.2 — — — — -46 +105 -120 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -4.80 — 2121 162.0 — — — — +7 -130 -15 60.3% +0.89 62–49 (56%) 57–51 (53%) 105.8 -5.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.