H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mima Jausovec vs Elly Appel H2H: 3-0
Mima Jausovec holds a 3–0 lead over Elly Appel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1980 Amsterdam fourth round 6-2 6-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1980* | Amsterdam | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mima Jausovec | 6-2 6-7 6-2 | Elly Appel | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1979* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mima Jausovec | 6-7 6-2 6-2 | Elly Appel | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1976* | Sarasota | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mima Jausovec | 6-1 2-6 6-1 | Elly Appel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mima Jausovec | #400 | #23 | 2 | 2,088 | 339 | 246 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Elly Appel | — | — | — | 1,717 | 64 | 80 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mima Jausovec | Elly Appel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 18–13 | 58.1% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 1977 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,008 | 1 | 5 | 1977 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 1978 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 6 | 1978 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 1979 | 32–28 | 53.3% | — | 1,866 | 1 | 6 | 1979 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 3 |
| 1980 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 6 | 1980 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 3 |
| 1981 | 57–28 | 67.1% | — | 2,010 | 1 | 6 | 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 3 |
| 1982 | 36–24 | 60.0% | — | 1,861 | 1 | 7 | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 3 |
| 1983 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,873 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #87 | 1,747 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,695 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,673 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #233 | 1,656 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #362 | 1,641 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |