H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Ivanna Madruga H2H: 2-0

Mima Jausovec holds a 2–0 lead over Ivanna Madruga in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1981 Minneapolis round of 32 4-6 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Ivanna Madruga
ARG Age 65

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec 4-6 6-3 6-1 Ivanna Madruga Match data Oct 1, 1981* R32 Minneapolis WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-1 6-3 Ivanna Madruga Match data Apr 25, 1981* QF Amelia Island Championships WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec — #23 2 2,092 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Ivanna Madruga — — — 1,917 131 88 59.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Ivanna Madruga
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0
15 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1 1978 6–6 50.0% — 1,555 0 0
18 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1 1979 7–10 41.2% — 1,629 0 0
19 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,006 0 4 1980 29–18 61.7% — 1,799 0 0
20 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5 1981 17–14 54.8% — 1,753 0 0
21 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6 1982 27–13 67.5% — 1,822 0 1
22 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,872 1 6 1983 25–12 67.6% — 1,882 0 1
23 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,947 1 6 1984 14–8 63.6% — 1,830 0 1
24 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,015 1 6 — — — — — — —
25 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,859 1 7 1986 5–5 50.0% — 1,776 0 1
26 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,874 1 7 — — — — — — —
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,748 1 7 — — — — — — —
28 1985 9–12 42.9% — 1,695 1 7 — — — — — — —
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 — — — — — — —
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 — — — — — — —
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Ivanna Madruga
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1980 10 6 16 62.5% 19 8 27 70.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 25 10 35 71.4% — — — — — — — —
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 17 8 25 68.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% 1984 — — — — 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — — — — —
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7% 1986 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% — 22 18 40 55.0% 99 53 152 65.1% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Ivanna Madruga
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1505 101.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.25
15 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.17 1977 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.22
17 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -2.15 1978 1555 122.5 — — — — — +16 — 55.2% +0.10 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.14
18 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -2.20 1979 1629 139.3 — — — — +19 -21 -55 45.0% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 97.3 -0.55
19 1976 2006 156.7 — — — — -269 +59 -235 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -4.08 1980 1800 145.5 — — — — -109 +68 — 59.8% +1.16 9–3 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 106.3 -5.23
20 1977 2011 161.8 — — — — -204 +129 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.46 1981 1753 140.7 — — — — -101 +166 -158 55.6% +0.39 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 100.1 -1.92
21 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -139 +160 -130 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 -4.09 1982 1823 151.8 — — — — -198 +149 — 64.4% +1.49 6–4 (60%) 1–1 — -2.57
22 1979 1873 146.6 — — — — -11 +165 -111 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.9 +0.01 1983 1883 143.8 — — — — -150 +78 — 65.9% +1.35 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 +0.53
23 1980 1947 156.3 — — — — +4 +49 -112 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.84 1984 1831 128.9 — — — — — +29 — 63.3% +1.12 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.18
24 1981 2015 157.3 — — — — -1 +4 -104 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 1859 148.8 — — — — +114 +111 -67 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 +1.20 1986 1776 112.3 — — — — — +17 — 45.5% -0.23 2–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.17
26 1983 1875 144.0 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 1748 131.8 — — — — -26 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1696 127.7 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1674 105.7 — — — — — +196 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1657 107.2 — — — — — +178 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1642 110.1 — — — — — +161 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2093 156.2 — — — — -46 +105 -120 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -4.80 — 1917 148.1 — — — — -115 +85 -111 59.2% +0.89 30–28 (52%) 12–18 (40%) 98.1 -4.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.