H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mima Jausovec vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 3-2
Mima Jausovec holds a 3–2 lead over Kathy Horvath in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1983 Roland Garros quarterfinal 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 69
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
3
–
2
5 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 1983* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Mima Jausovec | 6-1 6-1 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
| Apr 22, 1982* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 6-2 6-4 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Sep 14, 1981 | Tokyo Sillook | WTA 250 | BR | Carpet | Mima Jausovec | 6-2 6-2 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1981* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Kathy Horvath | 6-3 6-7 6-3 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Apr 9, 1980* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Mima Jausovec | 6-4 6-2 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mima Jausovec | #400 | #23 | 2 | 2,088 | 339 | 246 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mima Jausovec | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 18–13 | 58.1% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1975 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1977 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,008 | 1 | 5 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1978 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 6 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1979 | 32–28 | 53.3% | — | 1,866 | 1 | 6 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1980 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 6 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1981 | 57–28 | 67.1% | — | 2,010 | 1 | 6 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1982 | 36–24 | 60.0% | — | 1,861 | 1 | 7 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1983 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,873 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #87 | 1,747 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,695 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,673 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #233 | 1,656 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #362 | 1,641 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |