H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Leslie Allen H2H: 3-1

Mima Jausovec holds a 3–1 lead over Leslie Allen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 3–1 on carpet. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1982 Kansas City round of 16 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Leslie Allen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec 6-2 7-5 Leslie Allen Match data Feb 12, 1982* R16 Kansas City WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-0 6-4 Leslie Allen Match data Mar 12, 1981* R32 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 4-6 6-1 7-5 Leslie Allen Match data Feb 13, 1981* R16 Oakland WTA 250 Carpet
Leslie Allen 6-3 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data Feb 7, 1981* QF Detroit WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Leslie Allen — — — 1,886 87 122 41.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Leslie Allen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,004 0 4 — — — — — — —
20 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,487 0 0
21 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6 1978 0–3 0.0% — 1,458 0 0
22 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,870 1 6 1979 6–11 35.3% — 1,540 0 0
23 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,945 1 6 1980 12–20 37.5% — 1,609 0 0
24 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,013 1 6 1981 27–23 54.0% — 1,774 0 1
25 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,857 1 7 1982 25–22 53.2% — 1,819 0 1
26 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7 1983 12–17 41.4% — 1,775 0 1
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7 1984 2–14 12.5% — 1,574 0 1
28 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,553 0 1
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,524 0 1
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 1987 0–2 0.0% — 1,507 0 1
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Leslie Allen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1977 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% 1980 5 7 12 41.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7% 1981 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5%
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7% 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 12 10 22 54.5%
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1983 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1984 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% — 12 31 43 27.9% 16 24 40 40.0% 25 24 49 51.0% 33 41 74 44.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Leslie Allen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 2004 156.6 — — — — -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 2011 161.6 — — — — -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51 1977 1488 100.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — +0.04
21 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80 1978 1458 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.35
22 1979 1871 146.4 — — — — -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84 1979 1540 122.9 — — — — +64 +4 — 36.8% -1.10 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.3 +0.67
23 1980 1945 155.9 — — — — +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63 1980 1610 121.7 — — — — -87 -40 -63 39.2% -0.90 5–7 (42%) 5–1 (83%) 104.7 -1.93
24 1981 2013 157.1 — — — — 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76 1981 1774 141.2 — — — — -88 -136 -74 52.1% 0.00 11–8 (58%) 6–3 (67%) 106.9 -2.47
25 1982 1858 148.5 — — — — +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56 1982 1820 139.6 — — — — -122 -220 +3 51.0% +0.08 7–5 (58%) 5–7 (42%) 103.8 -1.82
26 1983 1874 143.9 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67 1983 1776 129.9 — — — — -40 -140 +39 43.9% -0.89 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 101.8 -0.80
27 1984 1748 131.7 — — — — -27 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31 1984 1574 92.3 — — — — +9 +43 +139 16.7% -2.42 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.4 -0.10
28 1985 1695 127.6 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67 1985 1554 99.8 — — — — +28 — — 20.0% -2.80 — — — -0.17
29 1986 1673 105.7 — — — — — +197 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18 1986 1524 100.2 — — — — — +34 — 37.5% -0.56 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) 97.4 +0.79
30 1987 1656 107.2 — — — — — +179 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.33 1987 1507 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — -0.10
31 1988 1641 110.1 — — — — — +162 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2091 156.0 — — — — -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15 — 1886 132.1 — — — — -61 -70 -14 42.5% -0.64 34–33 (51%) 22–26 (46%) 103.8 -2.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.