H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Louise Allen H2H: 2-0

Mima Jausovec holds a 2–0 lead over Louise Allen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1983 Indianapolis round of 64 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Louise Allen
USA Age 64

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec 6-2 6-1 Louise Allen Match data Aug 2, 1983* R64 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Mima Jausovec 6-3 6-3 Louise Allen Match data Jun 15, 1983* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Louise Allen — — — 1,758 67 100 40.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Louise Allen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1 1980 3–2 60.0% — 1,519 0 0
19 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,004 0 4 1981 6–5 54.5% — 1,540 0 0
20 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5 1982 22–5 81.5% — 1,736 0 3
21 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6 1983 3–7 30.0% — 1,706 0 3
22 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,870 1 6 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,685 0 3
23 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,945 1 6 — — — — — — —
24 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,013 1 6 1986 0–4 0.0% — 1,611 0 3
25 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,857 1 7 1987 3–8 27.3% — 1,564 0 3
26 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,584 0 3
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7 1989 9–15 37.5% — 1,561 0 3
28 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7 1990 2–9 18.2% — 1,492 0 3
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 1991 2–8 20.0% — 1,453 0 3
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 1992 10–14 41.7% — 1,576 0 3
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 1993 2–14 12.5% — 1,451 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Louise Allen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1982 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7% 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7% 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1988 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1989 8 12 20 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1993 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
Career — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% — 40 56 96 41.7% 4 16 20 20.0% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 10 10 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Louise Allen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97 1980 1520 102.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.07
19 1976 2004 156.6 — — — — -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78 1981 1540 111.9 — — — — — — — 53.6% +0.64 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 -0.03
20 1977 2011 161.6 — — — — -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51 1982 1736 132.6 — — — — -16 — — 75.4% +2.03 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 103.9 +2.84
21 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80 1983 1706 117.7 — — — — — -183 -107 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–1 — -0.80
22 1979 1871 146.4 — — — — -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84 1984 1686 96.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 — — +0.11
23 1980 1945 155.9 — — — — +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 2013 157.1 — — — — 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76 1986 1612 101.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–2 — +0.38
25 1982 1858 148.5 — — — — +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56 1987 1565 110.9 — — — — +20 -55 — 32.0% -1.28 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.0 +0.16
26 1983 1874 143.9 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67 1988 1584 119.3 — — — — -2 — — 45.7% -0.20 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.4 -0.03
27 1984 1748 131.7 — — — — -27 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31 1989 1561 113.9 — — — — -23 — — 43.1% -0.66 3–7 (30%) 5–2 (71%) 100.1 +0.22
28 1985 1695 127.6 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67 1990 1493 106.1 — — — — -19 — — 21.7% -1.39 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.64
29 1986 1673 105.7 — — — — — +197 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18 1991 1453 100.2 — — — — -9 — — 31.8% -1.54 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.75
30 1987 1656 107.2 — — — — — +179 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.33 1992 1576 125.0 — — — — +2 -118 -27 41.8% -0.80 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 103.6 -0.19
31 1988 1641 110.1 — — — — — +162 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77 1993 1452 91.9 — — — — +19 +6 +65 20.6% -2.12 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.2 +0.76
Career — 2091 156.0 — — — — -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15 — 1759 120.5 — — — — -7 -89 -37 43.6% -0.45 23–34 (40%) 18–22 (45%) 95.9 +2.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.