H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Marita Redondo H2H: 1-1

Mima Jausovec and Marita Redondo are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Marita Redondo won the 1976 WTA Finals round of 16 4-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Marita Redondo
USA Age 70

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marita Redondo 4-6 6-2 6-3 Mima Jausovec Match data Apr 12, 1976 R16 WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-3 3-6 6-1 Marita Redondo Match data Feb 27, 1976* R16 Sarasota WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Marita Redondo — — — 1,901 136 118 53.5% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Marita Redondo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1969 5–1 83.3% — 1,569 0 1
14 — — — — — — — 1970 11–4 73.3% — 1,623 0 3
15 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 1971 3–3 50.0% — 1,640 0 3
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1972 24–4 85.7% — 1,802 0 7
17 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1 1973 29–16 64.4% — 1,869 0 8
18 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,772 0 8
19 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,004 0 4 1975 11–13 45.8% — 1,694 0 8
20 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5 1976 16–17 48.5% — 1,785 0 8
21 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,770 0 8
22 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,870 1 6 1978 19–17 52.8% — 1,822 0 8
23 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,945 1 6 1979 11–19 36.7% — 1,749 0 8
24 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,013 1 6 1980 5–14 26.3% — 1,663 0 8
25 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,857 1 7 1981 0–4 0.0% — 1,610 0 8
26 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7 — — — — — — —
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7 — — — — — — —
28 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7 — — — — — — —
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 — — — — — — —
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 — — — — — — —
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Marita Redondo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — — 1971 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1972 10 0 10 100.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1973 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 6 17 64.7%
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1975 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 11 24 54.2%
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1978 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 9 10 19 47.4%
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 11 19 42.1%
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7% 1980 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7% 1981 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% — 47 30 77 61.0% 11 14 25 44.0% 20 17 37 54.1% 51 54 105 48.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Marita Redondo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1569 113.8 — — — — +113 — — 83.3% +2.42 — — — +1.54
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1623 120.3 — — — — +139 — — 68.8% +1.94 2–2 (50%) — — +3.88
15 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55 1971 1640 107.8 — — — — — — -49 46.7% -0.13 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.5 0.00
16 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.21 1972 1802 133.1 — — — — +121 -257 -90 81.7% +2.48 3–1 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 105.3 +4.96
17 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90 1973 1870 133.0 — — — — +64 -267 -112 61.6% +0.75 10–3 (77%) 2–2 (50%) 104.6 +0.66
18 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97 1974 1772 96.7 — — — — +58 — — 33.3% -1.25 0–2 — — +0.93
19 1976 2004 156.6 — — — — -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78 1975 1694 119.8 — — — — +67 -82 — 44.6% -0.52 5–3 (63%) 2–0 — +0.37
20 1977 2011 161.6 — — — — -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51 1976 1786 148.4 — — — — +68 -173 — 50.0% +0.29 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 106.1 -0.82
21 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80 1977 1770 99.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.09
22 1979 1871 146.4 — — — — -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84 1978 1822 142.6 — — — — +33 — -79 51.3% -0.21 6–4 (60%) 7–1 (88%) 108.0 -0.56
23 1980 1945 155.9 — — — — +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63 1979 1750 137.9 — — — — +41 — -40 35.9% -1.28 3–3 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.8 -0.40
24 1981 2013 157.1 — — — — 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76 1980 1663 116.6 — — — — -1 — — 28.6% -1.60 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.80
25 1982 1858 148.5 — — — — +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56 1981 1611 96.4 — — — — +14 — — 0.0% -3.63 — 0–1 — +0.38
26 1983 1874 143.9 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 1748 131.7 — — — — -27 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1695 127.6 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1673 105.7 — — — — — +197 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1656 107.2 — — — — — +179 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1641 110.1 — — — — — +162 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2091 156.0 — — — — -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15 — 1902 138.5 — — — — +60 -189 -84 52.4% +0.15 39–25 (61%) 22–12 (65%) 113.0 +4.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.