H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Pam Casale H2H: 3-0

Mima Jausovec holds a 3–0 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1984 Roland Garros round of 128 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Pam Casale
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec #28 6-2 6-4 Pam Casale #26 Match data May 30, 1984* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Mima Jausovec 6-3 6-3 Pam Casale Match data Aug 3, 1983* R32 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Mima Jausovec 6-3 6-4 Pam Casale Match data Apr 9, 1982* R16 Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,597 0 0
17 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1 1981 30–17 63.8% — 1,810 0 0
18 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,745 0 0
19 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,004 0 4 1983 23–20 53.5% — 1,770 0 0
20 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6 1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0
22 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,870 1 6 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0
23 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,945 1 6 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0
24 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,013 1 6 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,857 1 7 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7 1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,525 0 0
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7 — — — — — — —
28 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7 — — — — — — —
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 — — — — — — —
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 — — — — — — —
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Pam Casale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1980 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7%
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7% 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7% 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% — 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Pam Casale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.21 1980 1598 118.7 — — — — +29 — — 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +2.02
17 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90 1981 1811 140.3 — — — — -1 -153 -196 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +1.97
18 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97 1982 1745 140.3 — — — — -54 -4 -106 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.5 -3.37
19 1976 2004 156.6 — — — — -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78 1983 1770 144.1 — — — — -55 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.57
20 1977 2011 161.6 — — — — -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51 1984 1914 155.3 — — — — +6 -60 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -2.46
21 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80 1985 1814 137.6 — — — — +80 -54 -188 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.08
22 1979 1871 146.4 — — — — -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84 1986 1788 137.1 — — — — -56 +52 — 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -3.63
23 1980 1945 155.9 — — — — +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63 1987 1673 114.3 — — — — -20 — -77 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.50
24 1981 2013 157.1 — — — — 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76 1988 1552 100.5 — — — — +25 +207 — 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.01
25 1982 1858 148.5 — — — — +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56 1989 1547 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.21
26 1983 1874 143.9 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67 1990 1526 90.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.21
27 1984 1748 131.7 — — — — -27 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1695 127.6 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1673 105.7 — — — — — +197 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1656 107.2 — — — — — +179 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1641 110.1 — — — — — +162 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2091 156.0 — — — — -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15 — 1944 143.5 — — — — +1 +5 -153 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.