H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 1-1

Mima Jausovec and Patricia Medrado are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1984 Roland Garros round of 64 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Patricia Medrado
BRA Age 69

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec #28 6-4 6-4 Patricia Medrado #73 Match data May 31, 1984* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Patricia Medrado 6-4 6-4 Mima Jausovec Match data Jun 3, 1979* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec — #23 2 2,092 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Patricia Medrado — #67 9 1,837 156 164 48.8% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Patricia Medrado
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,535 0 0
19 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,006 0 4 1976 0–2 0.0% — 1,517 0 0
20 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,527 0 1
21 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6 1978 10–12 45.5% — 1,626 0 1
22 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,872 1 6 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,632 0 1
23 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,947 1 6 1980 22–10 68.8% — 1,656 0 4
24 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,015 1 6 1981 38–20 65.5% — 1,740 0 8
25 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,859 1 7 1982 33–25 56.9% — 1,779 0 10
26 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,874 1 7 1983 4–18 18.2% — 1,577 0 10
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,748 1 7 1984 11–15 42.3% #108 1,588 0 10
28 1985 9–12 42.9% — 1,695 1 7 1985 8–14 36.4% — 1,542 0 10
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 1986 12–14 46.2% #76 1,562 0 10
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 1987 6–13 31.6% #117 1,550 0 10
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 1988 4–11 26.7% #180 1,473 0 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Patricia Medrado
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 1975 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1978 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% 1980 — — — — 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — —
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7% 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7% 1982 2 6 8 25.0% 27 9 36 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1984 3 5 8 37.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% — 29 50 79 36.7% 84 75 159 52.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 3 21 24 12.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Patricia Medrado
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -2.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -2.20 1975 1535 102.4 — — — — — +33 — 75.0% +1.25 — — — +0.95
19 1976 2006 156.7 — — — — -269 +59 -235 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -4.08 1976 1517 92.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.04
20 1977 2011 161.8 — — — — -204 +129 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.46 1977 1528 97.0 — — — — +38 — — 33.3% -2.22 0–1 1–0 — +0.68
21 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -139 +160 -130 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 -4.09 1978 1627 116.6 — — — — +12 -76 — 40.4% -0.75 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 109.3 +0.30
22 1979 1873 146.6 — — — — -11 +165 -111 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.9 +0.01 1979 1633 122.5 — — — — -19 -10 — 40.9% -1.45 1–3 (25%) 5–0 (100%) 101.8 -0.21
23 1980 1947 156.3 — — — — +4 +49 -112 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.84 1980 1657 127.1 — — — — — -77 — 64.9% +1.30 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.7 +0.61
24 1981 2015 157.3 — — — — -1 +4 -104 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.23 1981 1740 134.1 — — — — -99 -51 — 63.3% +1.20 7–7 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 96.3 +2.33
25 1982 1859 148.8 — — — — +114 +111 -67 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 +1.20 1982 1780 140.9 — — — — -182 +94 — 56.6% +0.45 6–11 (35%) 7–3 (70%) 98.9 -1.80
26 1983 1875 144.0 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.60 1983 1578 104.1 — — — — -85 +204 — 24.0% -1.80 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.41
27 1984 1748 131.8 — — — — -26 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.24 1984 1589 120.4 — — — — -106 +162 — 48.3% -0.34 0–6 (0%) 5–3 (63%) 95.2 +0.35
28 1985 1696 127.7 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.55 1985 1543 114.5 — — — — -89 +100 — 39.1% -0.22 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.79
29 1986 1674 105.7 — — — — — +196 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.21 1986 1562 123.2 — — — — -78 +112 — 49.2% +0.11 5–8 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 +0.75
30 1987 1657 107.2 — — — — — +178 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.39 1987 1551 107.8 — — — — -104 +50 — 39.1% -0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.0 +0.60
31 1988 1642 110.1 — — — — — +161 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77 1988 1473 104.6 — — — — -64 +64 — 31.4% -1.20 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +1.45
Career — 2093 156.2 — — — — -46 +105 -120 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -4.80 — 1838 128.5 — — — — -84 +56 — 49.6% +0.05 39–57 (41%) 38–30 (56%) 96.2 +2.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.