H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Julie Richardson H2H: 1-0

Miriam Oremans holds a 1–0 lead over Julie Richardson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1993 Indian Wells Open round of 64 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Julie Richardson
NZL Age 59 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #88 7-5 6-1 Julie Richardson #154 Match data Feb 22, 1993 R64 Indian Wells Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Julie Richardson #643 #102 9 1,574 28 65 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Julie Richardson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 1985 2–3 40.0% #145 1,505 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1986 1–7 12.5% #162 1,456 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1987 5–7 41.7% #157 1,480 0 0
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1988 12–15 44.4% #103 1,557 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1989 1–7 12.5% #257 1,507 0 0
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1990 5–7 41.7% #137 1,528 0 0
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 1991 0–3 0.0% #556 1,504 0 0
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 1992 1–8 11.1% #157 1,459 0 0
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 1993 1–6 14.3% #301 1,411 0 0
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 1994 0–2 0.0% #367 1,400 0 0
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Julie Richardson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 10 11 21 47.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1989 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1990 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1991 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1992 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% — 19 41 60 31.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 17 26 34.6% 0 5 5 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Julie Richardson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 1985 1506 109.6 — — — — — — +98 45.5% +0.09 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.50
19 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 1986 1457 96.3 — — — — +67 — — 11.8% -2.65 1–0 0–1 — +0.40
20 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 1987 1481 103.7 — — — — +21 — +115 41.4% -0.66 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 101.9 +1.02
21 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 1988 1558 120.8 — — — — -12 — +44 45.8% -0.20 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 98.0 +1.35
22 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1989 1507 105.8 — — — — -9 — +69 21.1% -2.21 1–2 (33%) — — +0.02
23 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 1990 1528 104.3 — — — — -8 — +52 44.0% -0.60 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.93
24 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 1991 1504 101.0 — — — — -22 — — 0.0% -3.33 — 0–1 — -0.21
25 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 1992 1460 107.6 — — — — -39 — +124 19.0% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 -0.25
26 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 1993 1411 93.4 — — — — -32 — — 21.4% -2.29 1–1 1–0 — +0.47
27 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 1994 1400 94.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.09
28 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 — 1575 110.1 — — — — -5 — +83 33.5% -1.18 11–13 (46%) 8–15 (35%) 97.9 +4.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.