H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni vs Marina Erakovic H2H: 1-0

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni holds a 1–0 lead over Marina Erakovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni won the 2011 US Open round of 128 6-4 2-6 6-4.

CRO Age 44 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
New Zealand Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #96 6-4 2-6 6-4 Marina Erakovic #90 Match data Aug 31, 2011* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni — #20 1,924 1,798 136 166 45.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Marina Erakovic — #39 1,392 1,695 104 133 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Marina Erakovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 11–3 78.6% #49 1,676 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1998 15–11 57.7% #51 1,768 0 2 — — — — — — —
17 1999 11–13 45.8% #48 1,753 0 2 2005 1–1 50.0% #213 1,498 0 0
18 2000 2–12 14.3% #202 1,599 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2001 2–3 40.0% #192 1,595 0 2 2007 1–5 16.7% #153 1,457 0 0
20 2002 1–6 14.3% #203 1,545 0 2 2008 16–17 48.5% #66 1,517 0 0
21 2003 0–2 0.0% #348 1,524 0 2 2009 4–7 36.4% #227 1,514 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2010 2–7 22.2% #333 1,480 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2011 11–8 57.9% #61 1,627 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2012 19–21 47.5% #66 1,583 0 0
25 2007 1–1 50.0% #455 1,537 0 2 2013 20–16 55.6% #46 1,670 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2014 12–20 37.5% #76 1,607 0 1
27 2009 0–1 0.0% #258 1,518 0 2 2015 7–14 33.3% #135 1,542 0 1
28 2010 5–6 45.5% #96 1,554 0 2 2016 10–8 55.6% #106 1,620 0 1
29 2011 8–14 36.4% #129 1,551 0 2 2017 1–9 10.0% #197 1,547 0 1
30 2012 7–12 36.8% #105 1,535 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2013 8–11 42.1% #110 1,562 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2014 12–8 60.0% #60 1,706 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2015 17–26 39.5% #68 1,634 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2016 14–18 43.8% #80 1,625 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2017 20–16 55.6% #32 1,699 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2018 2–3 40.0% #327 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Marina Erakovic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
21 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
25 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 13 10 23 56.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
28 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2017 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 11 4 15 73.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 12 18 30 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 5 11 16 31.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 98 164 40.2% 49 42 91 53.8% 21 24 45 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — 60 83 143 42.0% 20 28 48 41.7% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Marina Erakovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1997 1676 143.4 — — — — -116 +86 — 67.7% +1.23 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 105.4 +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 1769 134.7 — — — — -188 +121 — 52.6% +0.37 5–2 (71%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 1754 132.9 — — — — -144 — -16 45.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 107.0 -0.61 2005 1498 95.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.29
18 2000 1599 100.7 — — — — -42 +102 +114 19.4% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.6 -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1595 108.4 — — — — — +137 — 36.4% -0.27 1–0 0–1 — -0.02 2007 1457 98.0 -0.61 -2.50 0.916 48.2% +4 — — 21.4% -1.36 1–1 — — +0.14
20 2002 1545 104.2 — — — — -70 — — 20.0% -2.53 0–1 0–1 — -0.26 2008 1518 119.1 +1.94 -2.96 1.003 49.8% -44 +13 +209 48.7% -0.08 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 +1.05
21 2003 1525 101.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.09 2009 1515 109.0 -1.10 -1.98 0.869 47.5% -39 — — 42.3% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.07
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1481 102.8 -1.18 -3.79 0.820 45.9% -45 — +253 25.0% -1.70 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.06
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1628 118.5 +1.72 -1.34 1.015 50.1% -75 — +125 55.3% +0.02 5–4 (56%) 1–0 — +0.25
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1584 114.0 +1.58 -1.34 1.023 50.5% -11 -32 +125 44.0% -0.37 9–6 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.2 +1.89
25 2007 1538 109.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.12 2013 1670 123.7 +2.86 -0.04 1.101 51.9% -28 -101 +64 53.0% +0.21 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.7 +0.26
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1608 123.2 -0.48 -1.04 0.958 49.3% +12 -33 +40 40.8% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.33
27 2009 1518 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.18 2015 1543 117.9 +1.24 -2.64 0.961 48.9% +76 -40 +68 44.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 -0.36
28 2010 1555 111.8 — — — — -71 — +159 44.4% -0.52 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.11 2016 1620 111.3 +0.21 -1.18 0.978 49.7% -22 +11 +15 48.7% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 102.4 +0.55
29 2011 1552 110.2 — — — — -83 +118 +143 41.2% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 5–2 (71%) 100.3 -0.83 2017 1548 105.9 -0.90 -2.01 0.788 45.4% +27 — — 15.8% -1.84 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.44
30 2012 1535 107.2 — — — — -72 +123 +177 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.2 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1562 122.6 +0.65 -0.89 1.023 51.1% -102 +80 +154 47.5% +0.25 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 95.1 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1707 129.5 +2.54 +0.56 1.087 51.8% -37 -114 — 59.5% +0.71 3–1 (75%) 3–4 (43%) 103.2 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1634 127.2 -1.64 -2.22 0.875 47.8% -4 -66 +47 43.0% -0.22 7–12 (37%) 2–10 (17%) 93.1 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1625 128.9 -1.32 +3.68 1.050 51.1% -45 +80 -9 47.9% +0.14 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1699 137.2 -0.69 +1.19 0.960 49.5% +14 +54 — 52.4% +0.08 10–6 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 101.6 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1690 108.4 -2.20 -1.43 0.772 44.8% +8 — — 40.0% -0.60 2–0 1–0 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1799 132.7 -0.52 +0.68 0.977 49.8% -54 +70 +84 45.8% -0.27 51–50 (50%) 31–45 (41%) 97.4 -1.08 — 1696 119.7 +0.96 -1.64 0.979 49.6% -14 -29 +123 44.6% -0.34 41–44 (48%) 31–29 (52%) 102.9 +1.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.