H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Misaki Doi vs Jarmila Wolfe H2H: 0-1

Jarmila Wolfe holds a 1–0 lead over Misaki Doi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jarmila Wolfe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2011 Kuala Lumpur round of 16 7-6(6) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Misaki Doi
Japan Age 35 Left-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jarmila Wolfe
AUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jarmila Wolfe #31 7-6(6) 6-3 Misaki Doi #124 Match data Mar 4, 2011* R16 Kuala Lumpur International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Misaki Doi #258 #30 1,555 1,734 99 167 37.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,800 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Misaki Doi Jarmila Wolfe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,537 0 0
19 2010 0–3 0.0% #132 1,475 0 0 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0
20 2011 6–11 35.3% #120 1,492 0 0 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0
21 2012 10–9 52.6% #93 1,552 0 0 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,504 0 0
22 2013 9–15 37.5% #90 1,569 0 0 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0
23 2014 5–10 33.3% #124 1,553 0 0 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,688 0 1
24 2015 13–14 48.1% #54 1,657 0 1 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,697 0 2
25 2016 20–27 42.6% #40 1,668 0 1 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,510 0 2
26 2017 9–17 34.6% #122 1,530 0 1 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2
27 2018 1–3 25.0% #128 1,571 0 1 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,553 0 2
28 2019 8–14 36.4% #82 1,644 0 1 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2
29 2020 1–8 11.1% #83 1,572 0 1 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,479 0 2
30 2021 11–21 34.4% #105 1,588 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2022 5–13 27.8% #173 1,457 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2023 1–2 33.3% #258 1,488 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Misaki Doi Jarmila Wolfe
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 2011 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2007 2 10 12 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2012 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2010 10 7 17 58.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2015 9 9 18 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2016 11 19 30 36.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2012 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2017 4 10 14 28.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
29 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 9 12 21 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 68 113 181 37.6% 17 36 53 32.1% 14 18 32 43.8% — — — — — 65 89 154 42.2% 27 29 56 48.2% 12 18 30 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 241/267 of Misaki Doi's and 42/47 of Jarmila Wolfe's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Misaki Doi Jarmila Wolfe
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2010 3/3 0.0 2.0 68.2% 56.7% 42.6% 55.7% 13.9% 52.3% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 15/17 1.1 3.4 62.4% 60.0% 40.7% 49.6% 40.7% 52.3% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 19/19 1.7 3.0 62.4% 62.6% 48.8% 48.0% 42.8% 57.5% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 20/24 1.3 3.2 59.3% 61.4% 48.6% 41.7% 39.2% 56.2% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2014 15/15 1.7 2.7 60.4% 62.4% 40.8% 53.7% 46.0% 53.5% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2015 18/27 2.4 2.5 62.7% 61.7% 46.2% 51.4% 59.2% 56.2% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2016 42/47 1.9 2.2 59.9% 61.9% 47.1% 57.8% 41.6% 56.1% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2017 24/26 1.1 1.9 62.7% 59.0% 46.8% 46.7% 40.3% 54.1% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 4/4 0.8 2.3 63.7% 59.6% 42.9% 57.1% 52.2% 53.6% 42.4% 2014 15/16 5.6 3.9 58.1% 67.2% 45.9% 47.1% 47.4% 57.9% 40.9%
28 2019 22/22 0.9 3.1 59.9% 60.8% 46.1% 50.0% 54.7% 54.8% 40.3% 2015 25/29 4.2 3.7 59.2% 65.8% 47.6% 45.6% 40.9% 58.3% 38.4%
29 2020 9/9 0.7 4.1 63.4% 58.5% 41.4% 54.0% 41.3% 51.8% 39.5% 2016 2/2 6.0 5.5 58.3% 61.4% 31.9% 50.0% 29.2% 49.2% 37.1%
30 2021 29/33 0.9 2.7 61.8% 58.0% 45.0% 44.7% 51.9% 53.2% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 18/18 1.2 3.6 60.4% 60.0% 39.4% 56.5% 46.6% 52.0% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 3/3 2.0 1.7 68.4% 64.7% 49.6% 56.6% 34.7% 60.3% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 241/267 1.4 2.8 61.4% 60.6% 45.2% 50.8% 45.4% 54.6% 40.5% — 42/241 4.8 3.9 58.8% 66.1% 46.3% 46.4% 42.7% 57.7% 39.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Misaki Doi Jarmila Wolfe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1532 109.1 — — — — — +33 — 66.7% +1.17 — — — -0.09
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1515 97.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1538 107.7 — — — — -8 — — 50.0% -0.63 — 1–0 — +0.03
19 2010 1475 100.7 -0.02 -0.90 0.729 43.5% — — — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.27 2006 1533 102.2 — — — — 0 +11 +27 40.9% -0.55 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +1.14
20 2011 1492 110.6 -2.09 -1.38 0.872 46.9% +9 — +124 35.3% -0.85 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.29 2007 1475 97.8 — — — — -41 +56 — 35.6% -0.98 1–4 (20%) 0–2 — +0.59
21 2012 1552 111.2 +0.40 -0.63 1.068 51.3% -14 — +104 48.9% +0.38 5–2 (71%) 0–3 (0%) 102.4 +1.74 2008 1505 117.9 — — — — -2 — — 35.0% -1.15 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.54
22 2013 1570 117.8 -0.57 -1.00 0.962 48.8% +1 -75 — 41.8% -0.62 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 -0.40 2009 1563 119.3 — — — — -98 +18 +22 43.4% -0.75 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 -0.65
23 2014 1553 112.0 -1.33 -1.10 0.890 47.5% -8 — — 35.3% -1.15 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -0.48 2010 1689 133.8 — — — — -92 -65 -29 61.4% +1.03 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 +1.85
24 2015 1658 123.9 -1.42 +0.28 0.967 49.9% -22 -122 -54 48.4% -0.26 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 101.8 -0.92 2011 1698 138.0 — — — — -35 -1 -32 55.3% +0.24 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 101.3 -1.13
25 2016 1669 124.6 +0.05 -2.56 0.894 47.9% -39 -94 0 42.7% -0.70 5–8 (38%) 6–3 (67%) 101.2 -0.95 2012 1510 111.2 — — — — +23 +130 — 33.3% -1.22 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 93.6 +0.36
26 2017 1531 112.4 -1.70 -2.51 0.872 47.2% -31 +75 — 32.1% -1.02 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 99.5 +0.29 2013 1535 111.3 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.14 1–1 — — +0.26
27 2018 1571 111.0 -0.62 -0.93 0.914 48.6% +3 — — 36.4% -0.27 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.14 2014 1554 120.0 +0.80 -1.14 0.972 49.3% +14 — — 47.4% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +0.49
28 2019 1645 124.7 -1.10 -1.27 0.892 47.9% -30 — — 40.4% -0.65 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.6 +0.04 2015 1537 122.3 +0.24 -2.00 0.920 48.3% +41 +43 +60 44.1% -0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.9 -0.27
29 2020 1573 110.0 -2.38 -1.23 0.819 45.8% -9 +73 — 29.2% -1.38 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.58 2016 1480 93.6 -1.39 +0.21 0.729 43.2% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.07
30 2021 1589 123.1 -2.40 -2.77 0.841 46.3% -9 -27 +70 35.3% -1.09 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.6 -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 1458 108.2 -3.32 -3.02 0.784 45.3% +75 -2 — 29.3% -1.46 3–2 (60%) 3–0 (100%) — +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 1489 114.0 -0.38 -0.81 0.899 47.3% +67 — — 42.9% -0.86 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1734 122.8 -1.24 -1.72 0.894 47.7% -11 -23 +50 38.9% -0.77 36–48 (43%) 23–28 (45%) 98.3 +0.11 — 1801 126.0 +0.36 -1.59 0.927 48.4% -18 +22 +9 46.4% -0.29 25–50 (33%) 27–30 (47%) 92.4 +0.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.