H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Misaki Doi vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 0-1
Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 1–0 lead over Misaki Doi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2013 Marrakech third round 6-2 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 35
Left-Handed
159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 45
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2013* | Marrakech | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Misaki Doi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Misaki Doi | #258 | #30 | 1,555 | 1,739 | 100 | 166 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lourdes Domínguez Lino | #1,129 | #40 | 1,305 | 1,674 | 125 | 157 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Misaki Doi | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #120 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #93 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #390 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #90 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #72 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #40 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #52 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #122 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #71 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #128 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #91 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #82 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #134 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #83 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2022 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #173 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #258 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #69 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #110 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #220 | 1,517 | 0 | 2 |