H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Misaki Doi vs Monica Puig H2H: 1-1

Misaki Doi and Monica Puig are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Misaki Doi leads 1–0 on grass, while Monica Puig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Misaki Doi won the 2015 Birmingham round of 64 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Misaki Doi
Japan Age 35 Left-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Monica Puig
PUR Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Misaki Doi #95 6-4 6-1 Monica Puig #88 Match data Jun 17, 2015* R64 Birmingham Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Monica Puig #60 6-4 6-2 Misaki Doi #104 Match data Feb 14, 2015* QF Pattaya International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Misaki Doi #258 #30 1,555 1,734 99 167 37.2% 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Monica Puig #1,073 #27 1,570 1,843 139 140 49.8% 0 1 0 0 0 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Misaki Doi Monica Puig
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #211 1,492 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0
19 2010 0–3 0.0% #132 1,475 0 0 2013 13–15 46.4% #56 1,570 0 0
20 2011 6–11 35.3% #120 1,492 0 0 2014 16–18 47.1% #59 1,614 0 1
21 2012 10–9 52.6% #93 1,552 0 0 2015 15–23 39.5% #92 1,578 0 1
22 2013 9–15 37.5% #90 1,569 0 0 2016 41–24 63.1% #32 1,770 0 2
23 2014 5–10 33.3% #124 1,553 0 0 2017 20–21 48.8% #58 1,724 0 2
24 2015 13–14 48.1% #54 1,657 0 1 2018 18–14 56.2% #53 1,780 0 2
25 2016 20–27 42.6% #40 1,668 0 1 2019 16–19 45.7% #79 1,686 0 2
26 2017 9–17 34.6% #122 1,530 0 1 2020 0–2 0.0% #105 1,623 0 2
27 2018 1–3 25.0% #128 1,571 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2019 8–14 36.4% #82 1,644 0 1 2022 0–1 0.0% #1073 1,619 0 2
29 2020 1–8 11.1% #83 1,572 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2021 11–21 34.4% #105 1,588 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2022 5–13 27.8% #173 1,457 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2023 1–2 33.3% #258 1,488 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Misaki Doi Monica Puig
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 5 11 16 31.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 2011 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2014 9 12 21 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 2012 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 25 14 39 64.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7%
23 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2017 17 15 32 53.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2015 9 9 18 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2018 17 12 29 58.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2016 11 19 30 36.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 2019 7 13 20 35.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2017 4 10 14 28.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2018 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 9 12 21 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 68 113 181 37.6% 17 36 53 32.1% 14 18 32 43.8% — 91 94 185 49.2% 34 30 64 53.1% 14 16 30 46.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 241/267 of Misaki Doi's and 252/279 of Monica Puig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Misaki Doi Monica Puig
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 2.0 7.0 59.8% 64.5% 41.2% 53.8% 50.0% 55.1% 45.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 1/2 4.0 3.0 50.0% 62.5% 53.1% 75.0% 0.0% 57.8% 30.0%
19 2010 3/3 0.0 2.0 68.2% 56.7% 42.6% 55.7% 13.9% 52.3% 34.8% 2013 27/28 2.7 2.7 62.4% 62.4% 51.4% 41.8% 51.2% 58.1% 43.0%
20 2011 15/17 1.1 3.4 62.4% 60.0% 40.7% 49.6% 40.7% 52.3% 41.7% 2014 33/34 3.1 4.4 59.8% 66.4% 46.7% 51.1% 46.9% 58.4% 42.7%
21 2012 19/19 1.7 3.0 62.4% 62.6% 48.8% 48.0% 42.8% 57.5% 45.5% 2015 32/38 4.4 4.0 60.7% 65.2% 51.0% 50.2% 49.1% 59.4% 38.4%
22 2013 20/24 1.3 3.2 59.3% 61.4% 48.6% 41.7% 39.2% 56.2% 42.1% 2016 52/65 3.1 3.6 62.0% 64.8% 49.8% 58.7% 46.5% 59.0% 44.7%
23 2014 15/15 1.7 2.7 60.4% 62.4% 40.8% 53.7% 46.0% 53.5% 41.4% 2017 39/41 3.3 3.4 60.1% 65.6% 47.8% 54.0% 45.1% 58.7% 42.8%
24 2015 18/27 2.4 2.5 62.7% 61.7% 46.2% 51.4% 59.2% 56.2% 42.3% 2018 31/32 3.0 3.4 61.3% 67.1% 45.7% 52.7% 48.6% 58.6% 42.1%
25 2016 42/47 1.9 2.2 59.9% 61.9% 47.1% 57.8% 41.6% 56.1% 39.3% 2019 33/35 3.3 3.6 62.5% 66.1% 48.0% 60.1% 51.9% 59.1% 44.1%
26 2017 24/26 1.1 1.9 62.7% 59.0% 46.8% 46.7% 40.3% 54.1% 40.0% 2020 2/2 1.5 6.0 64.6% 55.7% 28.2% 29.8% 28.6% 46.0% 34.8%
27 2018 4/4 0.8 2.3 63.7% 59.6% 42.9% 57.1% 52.2% 53.6% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2019 22/22 0.9 3.1 59.9% 60.8% 46.1% 50.0% 54.7% 54.8% 40.3% 2022 1/1 0.0 5.0 60.3% 51.2% 33.3% 53.8% 33.3% 44.1% 32.7%
29 2020 9/9 0.7 4.1 63.4% 58.5% 41.4% 54.0% 41.3% 51.8% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 29/33 0.9 2.7 61.8% 58.0% 45.0% 44.7% 51.9% 53.2% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 18/18 1.2 3.6 60.4% 60.0% 39.4% 56.5% 46.6% 52.0% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 3/3 2.0 1.7 68.4% 64.7% 49.6% 56.6% 34.7% 60.3% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 241/267 1.4 2.8 61.4% 60.6% 45.2% 50.8% 45.4% 54.6% 40.5% — 252/279 3.2 3.6 61.2% 65.2% 48.4% 53.3% 47.8% 58.6% 42.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Misaki Doi Monica Puig
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1492 103.5 -1.04 -2.47 1.020 50.6% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.15
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1464 94.8 -3.46 -3.96 0.711 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.17
19 2010 1475 100.7 -0.02 -0.90 0.729 43.5% — — — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.27 2013 1571 123.3 +1.46 -0.93 1.027 50.5% -93 +68 +69 50.0% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 5–3 (63%) 101.7 +0.09
20 2011 1492 110.6 -2.09 -1.38 0.872 46.9% +9 — +124 35.3% -0.85 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.29 2014 1615 129.5 +1.33 -0.33 1.027 50.6% -75 +119 0 48.7% +0.15 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 102.0 -0.29
21 2012 1552 111.2 +0.40 -0.63 1.068 51.3% -14 — +104 48.9% +0.38 5–2 (71%) 0–3 (0%) 102.4 +1.74 2015 1579 121.9 +0.62 -2.26 0.948 49.1% +9 +55 -13 42.4% -0.19 3–8 (27%) 5–11 (31%) 91.9 -0.38
22 2013 1570 117.8 -0.57 -1.00 0.962 48.8% +1 -75 — 41.8% -0.62 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 -0.40 2016 1771 137.9 +2.19 +1.46 1.092 52.0% -9 -57 -89 58.9% +0.70 12–5 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 108.8 -0.14
23 2014 1553 112.0 -1.33 -1.10 0.890 47.5% -8 — — 35.3% -1.15 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -0.48 2017 1724 133.3 +2.17 -0.36 1.036 50.7% +15 -63 — 47.4% -0.04 8–9 (47%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 -0.88
24 2015 1658 123.9 -1.42 +0.28 0.967 49.9% -22 -122 -54 48.4% -0.26 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 101.8 -0.92 2018 1780 137.8 +0.96 +0.23 1.017 50.5% +6 — — 56.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.8 -0.76
25 2016 1669 124.6 +0.05 -2.56 0.894 47.9% -39 -94 0 42.7% -0.70 5–8 (38%) 6–3 (67%) 101.2 -0.95 2019 1686 127.3 +1.69 +0.90 1.076 51.5% -34 +39 -64 50.0% +0.35 4–8 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 92.6 -0.89
26 2017 1531 112.4 -1.70 -2.51 0.872 47.2% -31 +75 — 32.1% -1.02 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 99.5 +0.29 2020 1624 94.4 -0.47 -3.91 0.644 40.5% — — — 20.0% -3.40 0–1 1–0 — +0.30
27 2018 1571 111.0 -0.62 -0.93 0.914 48.6% +3 — — 36.4% -0.27 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2019 1645 124.7 -1.10 -1.27 0.892 47.9% -30 — — 40.4% -0.65 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.6 +0.04 2022 1619 101.3 +0.44 +1.01 0.584 39.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.14
29 2020 1573 110.0 -2.38 -1.23 0.819 45.8% -9 +73 — 29.2% -1.38 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 1589 123.1 -2.40 -2.77 0.841 46.3% -9 -27 +70 35.3% -1.09 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.6 -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 1458 108.2 -3.32 -3.02 0.784 45.3% +75 -2 — 29.3% -1.46 3–2 (60%) 3–0 (100%) — +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 1489 114.0 -0.38 -0.81 0.899 47.3% +67 — — 42.9% -0.86 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1734 122.8 -1.24 -1.72 0.894 47.7% -11 -23 +50 38.9% -0.77 36–48 (43%) 23–28 (45%) 98.3 +0.11 — 1843 134.9 +1.52 -0.09 1.029 50.7% -18 +21 -39 50.3% +0.16 40–50 (44%) 29–34 (46%) 100.5 -1.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.