Misaki Doi
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | 1 | 5 | 6 | Mar 12, 2022 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jun 17, 2021 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 2 | 4 | 6 | Mar 9, 2019 | H2H |
| Polona Hercog | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 9, 2021 | H2H |
| Christina Mchale | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 18, 2016 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Misaki Doi vs Veronica Cepede Royg H2H: 0-1
Veronica Cepede Royg holds a 1–0 lead over Misaki Doi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Veronica Cepede Royg leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Veronica Cepede Royg won the 2017 Miami Open first round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veronica Cepede Royg | 6-2 6-4 | Misaki Doi | Match data | Mar 23, 2017* | R128 | Miami Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Misaki Doi | #258 | #30 | 1,555 | 1,734 | 99 | 167 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Veronica Cepede Royg | #917 | #73 | 820 | 1,690 | 26 | 44 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Misaki Doi | Veronica Cepede Royg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #120 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #90 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #54 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #40 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #75 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #122 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #138 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #128 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #82 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #83 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #173 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #258 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Misaki Doi | Veronica Cepede Royg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2012 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2012 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2015 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2016 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 25 | 2016 | 11 | 19 | 30 | 36.7% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2017 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | 2017 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2018 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2018 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 68 | 113 | 181 | 37.6% | 17 | 36 | 53 | 32.1% | 14 | 18 | 32 | 43.8% | — | 12 | 22 | 34 | 35.3% | 11 | 15 | 26 | 42.3% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 241/267 of Misaki Doi's and 65/68 of Veronica Cepede Royg's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Misaki Doi | Veronica Cepede Royg | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 2010 | 3/3 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 68.2% | 56.7% | 42.6% | 55.7% | 13.9% | 52.3% | 34.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 15/17 | 1.1 | 3.4 | 62.4% | 60.0% | 40.7% | 49.6% | 40.7% | 52.3% | 41.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 19/19 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 62.4% | 62.6% | 48.8% | 48.0% | 42.8% | 57.5% | 45.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 20/24 | 1.3 | 3.2 | 59.3% | 61.4% | 48.6% | 41.7% | 39.2% | 56.2% | 42.1% | 2014 | 3/4 | 1.0 | 3.7 | 65.0% | 58.8% | 35.4% | 31.8% | 59.4% | 50.8% | 38.3% |
| 23 | 2014 | 15/15 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 60.4% | 62.4% | 40.8% | 53.7% | 46.0% | 53.5% | 41.4% | 2015 | 6/6 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 59.6% | 62.6% | 54.3% | 54.0% | 64.7% | 58.8% | 47.5% |
| 24 | 2015 | 18/27 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 62.7% | 61.7% | 46.2% | 51.4% | 59.2% | 56.2% | 42.3% | 2016 | 14/15 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 68.4% | 59.8% | 48.3% | 42.8% | 51.5% | 56.3% | 44.4% |
| 25 | 2016 | 42/47 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 59.9% | 61.9% | 47.1% | 57.8% | 41.6% | 56.1% | 39.3% | 2017 | 25/26 | 1.2 | 3.9 | 63.7% | 59.5% | 44.3% | 48.8% | 47.7% | 53.8% | 43.6% |
| 26 | 2017 | 24/26 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 62.7% | 59.0% | 46.8% | 46.7% | 40.3% | 54.1% | 40.0% | 2018 | 17/17 | 1.6 | 3.9 | 61.9% | 60.3% | 47.2% | 48.3% | 50.3% | 55.2% | 40.7% |
| 27 | 2018 | 4/4 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 63.7% | 59.6% | 42.9% | 57.1% | 52.2% | 53.6% | 42.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 22/22 | 0.9 | 3.1 | 59.9% | 60.8% | 46.1% | 50.0% | 54.7% | 54.8% | 40.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 9/9 | 0.7 | 4.1 | 63.4% | 58.5% | 41.4% | 54.0% | 41.3% | 51.8% | 39.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 29/33 | 0.9 | 2.7 | 61.8% | 58.0% | 45.0% | 44.7% | 51.9% | 53.2% | 39.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 18/18 | 1.2 | 3.6 | 60.4% | 60.0% | 39.4% | 56.5% | 46.6% | 52.0% | 37.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 3/3 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 68.4% | 64.7% | 49.6% | 56.6% | 34.7% | 60.3% | 35.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 241/267 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 61.4% | 60.6% | 45.2% | 50.8% | 45.4% | 54.6% | 40.5% | — | 65/70 | 1.3 | 3.5 | 63.9% | 60.0% | 46.5% | 47.1% | 51.3% | 55.0% | 43.1% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Misaki Doi | Veronica Cepede Royg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 2010 | 1475 | 100.7 | -0.02 | -0.90 | 0.729 | 43.5% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.71 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 1492 | 110.6 | -2.09 | -1.38 | 0.872 | 46.9% | +9 | — | +124 | 35.3% | -0.85 | 2–0 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.29 | 2012 | 1492 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.05 |
| 21 | 2012 | 1552 | 111.2 | +0.40 | -0.63 | 1.068 | 51.3% | -14 | — | +104 | 48.9% | +0.38 | 5–2 (71%) | 0–3 (0%) | 102.4 | +1.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 1570 | 117.8 | -0.57 | -1.00 | 0.962 | 48.8% | +1 | -75 | — | 41.8% | -0.62 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.5 | -0.40 | 2014 | 1468 | 95.3 | -1.36 | -1.34 | 0.778 | 44.5% | — | +65 | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.31 |
| 23 | 2014 | 1553 | 112.0 | -1.33 | -1.10 | 0.890 | 47.5% | -8 | — | — | 35.3% | -1.15 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | 99.7 | -0.48 | 2015 | 1487 | 110.2 | +0.96 | +1.62 | 1.153 | 53.1% | — | +51 | — | 57.1% | +0.79 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.36 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1658 | 123.9 | -1.42 | +0.28 | 0.967 | 49.9% | -22 | -122 | -54 | 48.4% | -0.26 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–3 (57%) | 101.8 | -0.92 | 2016 | 1521 | 115.2 | -0.05 | -0.12 | 1.016 | 50.2% | -24 | -22 | +151 | 41.7% | -0.25 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 98.5 | +0.56 |
| 25 | 2016 | 1669 | 124.6 | +0.05 | -2.56 | 0.894 | 47.9% | -39 | -94 | 0 | 42.7% | -0.70 | 5–8 (38%) | 6–3 (67%) | 101.2 | -0.95 | 2017 | 1623 | 112.8 | -1.80 | +0.06 | 0.944 | 48.7% | -64 | 0 | +49 | 42.9% | -0.59 | 8–5 (62%) | 3–3 (50%) | 106.3 | +0.14 |
| 26 | 2017 | 1531 | 112.4 | -1.70 | -2.51 | 0.872 | 47.2% | -31 | +75 | — | 32.1% | -1.02 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–4 (20%) | 99.5 | +0.29 | 2018 | 1561 | 120.5 | -0.88 | -1.25 | 0.909 | 48.2% | +21 | +25 | — | 34.1% | -1.00 | 1–6 (14%) | 3–1 (75%) | 96.7 | -0.31 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1571 | 111.0 | -0.62 | -0.93 | 0.914 | 48.6% | +3 | — | — | 36.4% | -0.27 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.14 | 2019 | 1551 | 95.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 1645 | 124.7 | -1.10 | -1.27 | 0.892 | 47.9% | -30 | — | — | 40.4% | -0.65 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.6 | +0.04 | 2020 | 1516 | 95.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 1573 | 110.0 | -2.38 | -1.23 | 0.819 | 45.8% | -9 | +73 | — | 29.2% | -1.38 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.58 | 2021 | 1490 | 101.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.04 |
| 30 | 2021 | 1589 | 123.1 | -2.40 | -2.77 | 0.841 | 46.3% | -9 | -27 | +70 | 35.3% | -1.09 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 102.6 | -0.58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 1458 | 108.2 | -3.32 | -3.02 | 0.784 | 45.3% | +75 | -2 | — | 29.3% | -1.46 | 3–2 (60%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | +1.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 1489 | 114.0 | -0.38 | -0.81 | 0.899 | 47.3% | +67 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.86 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1734 | 122.8 | -1.24 | -1.72 | 0.894 | 47.7% | -11 | -23 | +50 | 38.9% | -0.77 | 36–48 (43%) | 23–28 (45%) | 98.3 | +0.11 | — | 1691 | 114.4 | -0.91 | -0.24 | 0.959 | 49.1% | -29 | +20 | +93 | 40.5% | -0.62 | 12–18 (40%) | 9–8 (53%) | 99.7 | +1.64 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Veronica Cepede Royg
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paula Cristina Goncalves | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 14, 2016 | H2H |
| Irina-Camelia Begu | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 28, 2018 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 17, 2018 | H2H |
| Kristie Ahn | 2 | 0 | 2 | Sep 22, 2017 | H2H |
| Varvara Lepchenko | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 22, 2017 | H2H |