Molly Van Nostrand
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Minter | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 14, 1989 | H2H |
| Laura Arraya | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 24, 1989 | H2H |
| Terry Phelps | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 5, 1989 | H2H |
| Masako Yanagi | 0 | 2 | 2 | Apr 21, 1988 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Molly Van Nostrand vs Pam Casale H2H: 0-2
Pam Casale holds a 2–0 lead over Molly Van Nostrand in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Casale leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1986 Indianapolis round of 64 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Casale | 6-2 6-1 | Molly Van Nostrand | Match data | Apr 29, 1986* | R64 | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Pam Casale | 6-4 6-1 | Molly Van Nostrand | Match data | Oct 24, 1985* | R32 | Brighton | WTA 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molly Van Nostrand | — | — | — | 1,684 | 36 | 67 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Molly Van Nostrand | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Molly Van Nostrand | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1981 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1980 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 18 | 1983 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% |
| 19 | 1984 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 20 | 1985 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1984 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% |
| 21 | 1986 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1985 | 17 | 7 | 24 | 70.8% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 22 | 1987 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1986 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% |
| 23 | 1988 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1987 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1989 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1988 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 24 | 32 | 56 | 42.9% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 6 | 15 | 21 | 28.6% | 6 | 15 | 21 | 28.6% | — | 66 | 49 | 115 | 57.4% | 55 | 41 | 96 | 57.3% | 15 | 19 | 34 | 44.1% | 25 | 35 | 60 | 41.7% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Molly Van Nostrand | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1981 | 1486 | 96.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.26 | 1980 | 1598 | 118.7 | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | — | 57.4% | +0.72 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +2.02 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1811 | 140.3 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -153 | -196 | 64.1% | +1.03 | 3–6 (33%) | 6–0 (100%) | 101.9 | +1.97 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1517 | 107.4 | — | — | — | — | +83 | — | — | 58.3% | +0.83 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.77 | 1982 | 1745 | 140.3 | — | — | — | — | -54 | -4 | -106 | 50.5% | +0.01 | 1–8 (11%) | 9–5 (64%) | 95.5 | -3.37 |
| 19 | 1984 | 1532 | 103.9 | — | — | — | — | +82 | — | — | 43.8% | -0.28 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.0 | +1.55 | 1983 | 1770 | 144.1 | — | — | — | — | -55 | +93 | -103 | 52.1% | +0.47 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–3 (50%) | 102.6 | -1.57 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1625 | 138.4 | — | — | — | — | +13 | — | +13 | 46.7% | -0.60 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–2 (50%) | 99.9 | -0.37 | 1984 | 1914 | 155.3 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -60 | -210 | 64.8% | +1.01 | 3–6 (33%) | 7–3 (70%) | 100.3 | -2.46 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1632 | 119.0 | — | — | — | — | +27 | — | -54 | 31.9% | -1.36 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–4 (20%) | 99.6 | -1.00 | 1985 | 1814 | 137.6 | — | — | — | — | +80 | -54 | -188 | 53.1% | +0.34 | 6–4 (60%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.8 | -1.08 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1535 | 102.5 | — | — | — | — | +56 | — | -1 | 30.0% | -1.57 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.95 | 1986 | 1788 | 137.1 | — | — | — | — | -56 | +52 | — | 46.8% | -0.18 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–3 (67%) | 103.7 | -3.63 |
| 23 | 1988 | 1510 | 101.9 | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.86 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | -0.01 | 1987 | 1673 | 114.3 | — | — | — | — | -20 | — | -77 | 41.7% | -0.56 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.50 |
| 24 | 1989 | 1504 | 111.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 34.1% | -1.19 | 3–4 (43%) | 0–2 | — | -0.14 | 1988 | 1552 | 100.5 | — | — | — | — | +25 | +207 | — | 36.4% | -0.79 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–2 (33%) | 92.4 | +1.01 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1547 | 93.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | -0.21 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1526 | 90.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.21 |
| Career | — | 1685 | 119.3 | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | -3 | 37.3% | -1.00 | 12–19 (39%) | 5–14 (26%) | 93.7 | +1.97 | — | 1944 | 143.5 | — | — | — | — | +1 | +5 | -153 | 53.9% | +0.36 | 32–43 (43%) | 38–21 (64%) | 100.1 | -2.42 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Pam Casale
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 3 | 7 | 10 | May 10, 1986 | H2H |
| Pilar Vasquez | 5 | 2 | 7 | Apr 6, 1988 | H2H |
| Bonnie Gadusek | 0 | 7 | 7 | Oct 13, 1985 | H2H |
| Bettina Bunge | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 19, 1987 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 3 | 3 | 6 | Nov 13, 1986 | H2H |