H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mona Barthel vs Ana Ivanovic H2H: 2-1
Mona Barthel holds a 2–1 lead over Ana Ivanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mona Barthel leads 1–0 on clay, while Ana Ivanovic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ana Ivanovic won the 2014 Birmingham third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2014* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Ana Ivanovic | 6-4 6-1 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2013* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Mona Barthel | 6-1 3-6 6-0 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2012* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Mona Barthel | 7-5 7-6(4) | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mona Barthel | #223 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,841 | 151 | 179 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mona Barthel | Ana Ivanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 2012 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 |
| 22 | 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 |
| 23 | 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 |
| 24 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 |
| 25 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,555 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,600 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,552 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 |
| 30 | 2021 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #275 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,535 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |