H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mona Barthel vs Chanelle Scheepers H2H: 2-2
Mona Barthel and Chanelle Scheepers are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mona Barthel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mona Barthel won the 2014 Bastad final 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2014* | Bastad | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Mona Barthel | 6-3 7-6(3) | Chanelle Scheepers | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2013* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Mona Barthel | 7-6(3) 7-5 | Chanelle Scheepers | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2012* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Chanelle Scheepers | 6-1 4-6 6-1 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2011* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Chanelle Scheepers | 6-4 7-5 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mona Barthel | #223 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,841 | 151 | 179 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Chanelle Scheepers | #429 | #37 | 1,505 | 1,725 | 87 | 108 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mona Barthel | Chanelle Scheepers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,555 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,600 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #103 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #38 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,552 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #275 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #77 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #424 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,535 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |