H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Mona Barthel vs Magdalena Rybarikova H2H: 1-1
Mona Barthel and Magdalena Rybarikova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mona Barthel leads 1–0 on grass, while Magdalena Rybarikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mona Barthel won the 2018 Nottingham fourth round 6-3 1-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2018* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Mona Barthel | 6-3 1-6 7-5 | Magdalena Rybarikova | Match data |
| Mar 20, 2013* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Magdalena Rybarikova | 6-3 7-6(5) | Mona Barthel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mona Barthel | #223 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,841 | 151 | 179 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Magdalena Rybarikova | #199 | #17 | 2,405 | 1,817 | 188 | 207 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mona Barthel | Magdalena Rybarikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2012 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #62 | 1,605 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #37 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,555 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,691 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,600 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #80 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,552 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #48 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2021 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #275 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,535 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |